Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc. et al

Filing 101

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Extension of Time for Deadlines in Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 6/26/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/15/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)

1

6

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
ANDREW S. TULUMELLO, SBN 196484
[e-mail]
GEOFFREY M. SIGLER
[e-mail]
JASON R. MELTZER
[e-mail]
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.467.0539

7

Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North America, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

MARKUS WILSON and DOUG CAMPEN,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 3:12-cv-01586-SC
Pleading Type: Class Action
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE

v.
Judge: The Honorable Samuel Conti
FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant.

17
18
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2014, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding
19
Scheduling (ECF No. 87), which had been proposed by the parties in the above-captioned matter;
20
WHEREAS, the parties agreed that the Stipulation did not waive any right of the parties to
21
request or stipulate to further extensions;
22
WHEREAS, the parties agree that additional time is necessary to conduct discovery; and
23
24

WHEREAS, this is the parties’ second request to modify the schedule;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the

25
parties will be bound by the following schedule:
26
27
28

Deadline for Fact Discovery
Date for Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Expert(s)
Disclosure(s), Including Report(s), Declarations,
and Evidence (if any)

December 17, 2014
January 21, 2015

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
and All Non-Expert Supporting Declarations,
Evidence, and Any Other Supporting Materials
Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Class Certification
Expert(s) (if any) by
Date for Frito-Lay’s Class Certification Expert(s)
Disclosure(s), Including Report(s) (if any)
Date for Frito-Lay’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Class Certification Motion
Deposition of Frito-Lay’s Class Certification
Expert(s) (if any) by
Date for Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Class
Certification
Class Certification Hearing

January 21, 2015
March 4, 2015
April 15, 2015
April 15, 2015
May 13, 2015
Jun 10, 2015
June 26, 2015

In accordance with N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

12
13

Dated: October 7, 2014

14

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
By: /s/ Andrew S. Tulumello
Andrew S. Tulumello

15

Andrew S. Tulumello
Geoffrey M. Sigler (pro hac vice)
Jason R. Meltzer (pro hac vice)
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.467.0539

16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North
America, Inc.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 7, 2014

Don Barrett, P.A.
By:

/s/ David Malcolm McMullan, Jr.
David Malcolm McMullan, Jr.
P.O. Box 987
404 Court Square North
Lexington, MS 39095
Telephone: [phone]
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Pratt & Associates
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

2

1

Facsimile: 408.369.0752

2

Dewitt Marshall Lovelace, Sr.
Lovelace Law Firm, P.A.
12870 US Hwy 98 W.
Suite 200
Miramar Beach, FL 32550
Telephone: [phone]

3
4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10

CASE SCHEDULING [PROPOSED] ORDER

11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

13
14
15

10/15/2014
Dated: __________________

_________________________________
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

3

1

CASE SCHEDULING [PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

4

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I, Andrew S. Tulumello, certify as follows:

3

I am employed in Washington, DC. I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to

4

this action. My business address is 1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036. I certify

5

that on the date indicated below, I caused the following document to be electronically transmitted to

6

the Clerk and to each of the persons named below, who are registered as CM/ECF users and have

7

consented to electronic service, using the CM/ECF System:

8
9

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE

10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wilson and
Campen
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Pratt & Associates
1871 The Alameda
Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15

David Malcolm McMullan , Jr.
Don Barrett, P.A.
P.O. Box 987
404 Court Square North
Lexington, MS 39095
[e-mail]

16
17
18

Dewitt Marshall Lovelace, Sr.
Lovelace Law Firm, P.A.
12870 US Hwy 98 W.
Suite 200
Miramar Beach, FL 32550
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23

DATED: October 7, 2014

/s/ Andrew S. Tulumello
Andrew S. Tulumello

24
25
26
27
28
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. C12-01586-SC