Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc. et al

Filing 190

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 189 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 184 MOTION to Substitute Party and to Amend STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFFO filed by Doug Campen, Markus Wilson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 21, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2017).

Download PDF
1 4 PIERCE GORE, SBN 128515 pgore@prattattorneys.com PRATT & ASSOCIATES 1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 425 SAN JOSE, CA 95126 Telephone: 408-429-6506 Facsimile: 408-369-0752 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 [Additional counsel on signature page] 2 3 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 MARKUS WILSON and DOUG CAMPEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC., Case No. C12-01586 Assigned to the Honorable Jon Tigar STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017 Defendant. Hearing Currently Set For: Date: July 13, 2017 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF ISO MOTION TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017 CASE NO. C12-01586 1 2 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend to substitute Jeff Mains in place of Markus Wilson and Doug Campen on June 2, 2017 (Dkt. No. 184), Defendant Frito-Lay filed its Opposition/Response on June 16, 2017 (Dkt. No. 188); 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ reply brief is presently due on June 23, 2017; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion is presently scheduled for hearing on July 13, 2017; 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel have deadlines and scheduling conflicts that necessitate a one-week extension of the deadline for Plaintiffs’ reply brief; and 8 9 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs’ reply brief to June 30, 2017, subject to the Court’s approval; 10 11 12 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend/Substitute Plaintiff is extended to June 30, 2017. 13 14 Dated: June 20, 2017 15 16 17 By: /s/ Pierce Gore Pierce Gore By: /s/ Andrew S. Tulumello Andrew S. Tulumello 21 David McMullan, Jr. (pro hac vice) DON BARRETT, P.A. P.O. Box 927 404 Court Square North Lexington, MS 39095 Telephone: (662) 834-2488 Fax: (662) 834-2628 Andrew S. Tulumello Geoffrey M. Sigler (pro hac vice) Jason R. Meltzer (pro hac vice) 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.955.8500 Facsimile: 202.467.0539 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North America, Inc. 18 19 20 23 24 25 I, Pierce Gore, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF ISO MOTION TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017 CASE NO. C12-01586 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief In Support of Motion for Leave to Amend/Substitute Plaintiff is hereby extended to June 30, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED, this the day of June, 2017. 5 6 7 ________________________ Hon. Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF ISO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017 CASE NO. C12-01586

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?