Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc. et al
Filing
190
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 189 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 184 MOTION to Substitute Party and to Amend STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFFO filed by Doug Campen, Markus Wilson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 21, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2017).
1
4
PIERCE GORE, SBN 128515
pgore@prattattorneys.com
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 425
SAN JOSE, CA 95126
Telephone: 408-429-6506
Facsimile: 408-369-0752
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
[Additional counsel on signature page]
2
3
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
MARKUS WILSON and DOUG CAMPEN,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Case No. C12-01586
Assigned to the Honorable Jon Tigar
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE
PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017
Defendant.
Hearing Currently Set For:
Date: July 13, 2017
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF
ISO MOTION TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017
CASE NO. C12-01586
1
2
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend to substitute Jeff Mains in place of
Markus Wilson and Doug Campen on June 2, 2017 (Dkt. No. 184), Defendant Frito-Lay filed its
Opposition/Response on June 16, 2017 (Dkt. No. 188);
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ reply brief is presently due on June 23, 2017;
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion is presently scheduled for hearing on July 13, 2017;
6
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel have deadlines and scheduling conflicts that necessitate a
one-week extension of the deadline for Plaintiffs’ reply brief; and
8
9
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs’ reply
brief to June 30, 2017, subject to the Court’s approval;
10
11
12
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through
their counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support
of Motion for Leave to Amend/Substitute Plaintiff is extended to June 30, 2017.
13
14
Dated: June 20, 2017
15
16
17
By:
/s/ Pierce Gore
Pierce Gore
By:
/s/ Andrew S. Tulumello
Andrew S. Tulumello
21
David McMullan, Jr. (pro hac vice)
DON BARRETT, P.A.
P.O. Box 927
404 Court Square North
Lexington, MS 39095
Telephone: (662) 834-2488
Fax: (662) 834-2628
Andrew S. Tulumello
Geoffrey M. Sigler (pro hac vice)
Jason R. Meltzer (pro hac vice)
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: 202.955.8500
Facsimile: 202.467.0539
22
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North
America, Inc.
18
19
20
23
24
25
I, Pierce Gore, attest that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained
from the other signatory.
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF
ISO MOTION TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017
CASE NO. C12-01586
1
2
3
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief In Support of
Motion for Leave to Amend/Substitute Plaintiff is hereby extended to June 30, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this the
day of June, 2017.
5
6
7
________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF
ISO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF TO JUNE 30, 2017
CASE NO. C12-01586
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?