Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc. et al

Filing 92

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Extension of Time for Deadlines in Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 4/17/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 06/30/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)

1

6

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
ANDREW S. TULUMELLO, SBN 196484
[e-mail]
GEOFFREY M. SIGLER
[e-mail]
JASON R. MELTZER
[e-mail]
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.467.0539

7

Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North America, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

MARKUS WILSON and DOUG CAMPEN,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 3:12-cv-01586-SC
Pleading Type: Class Action
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE

v.
Judge: The Honorable Samuel Conti
FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant.

17
18
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2014, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding
19
Scheduling (ECF No. 87), which had been proposed by the parties in the above-captioned matter;
20
WHEREAS, the parties agreed that the Stipulation did not waive any right of the parties to
21
request or stipulate to further extensions;
22
WHEREAS, the parties agree that additional time is necessary to conduct discovery; and
23
24

WHEREAS, this is the parties’ first request to modify the schedule;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the

25
parties will be bound by the following schedule:
26
27
28

Deadline for Fact Discovery
Date for Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Expert(s)
Disclosure(s), Including Report(s), Declarations,
and Evidence (if any)

October 14, 2014
October 30, 2014

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
and All Non-Expert Supporting Declarations,
Evidence, and Any Other Supporting Materials
Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Class Certification
Expert(s) (if any) by
Date for Frito-Lay’s Class Certification Expert(s)
Disclosure(s), Including Report(s) (if any)
Date for Frito-Lay’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Class Certification Motion
Deposition of Frito-Lay’s Class Certification
Expert(s) (if any) by
Date for Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Class
Certification
Class Certification Hearing

December 12, 2014
January 30, 2015
January 30, 2015
March 2, 2015
March 30, 2015
April 17, 2015

In accordance with N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the

10
11

October 30, 2014

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

12
13

Dated: June 27, 2014

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

14

By:

15

Andrew S. Tulumello
Geoffrey M. Sigler (pro hac vice)
Jason R. Meltzer (pro hac vice)
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.467.0539

16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendant Frito-Lay North
America, Inc.

20

I
Dated: June 27, 2014 STRICT
ES D

amu
Judge S

RT

27

el Conti

NO

26

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

ER

A

H

28

R NIA

25

Don Barrett, P.A.

C

FO

24

UNIT
ED

23

T
TA 06/30/2014

RT
U
O

S

22

LI

21

/s/ Andrew S. Tulumello
Andrew S. Tulumello

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

By:

/s/ David Malcolm McMullan Jr.
David Malcolm McMullan, Jr.
David Malcolm McMullan, Jr.
P.O. Box 987
404 Court Square North
Lexington, MS 39095
Telephone: [phone]
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Pratt & Associates
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

2

1
2
3
4
5

San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 408.369.0752
Dewitt Marshall Lovelace, Sr.
Lovelace Law Firm, P.A.
12870 US Hwy 98 W.
Suite 200
Miramar Beach, FL 32550
Telephone: [phone]

6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES IN SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01586-SC

3