Zylka v. Discover Bank et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union LLC, Trans Union LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 08/16/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 6 William R. Brown, Esq. (IN #26782-48) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: wbrown@schuckitlaw.com ahamm@schuckitlaw.com 7 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 8 12 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan Wolf, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppanwolf@rbg-law.com 13 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 20 21 22 23 FAYE S. ZYLKA, Plaintiff, vs. DISCOVER BANK; TRANS UNION, LLC; and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:12-cv-01589-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY 24 25 Plaintiff Faye S. Zylka, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), 26 by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been 27 compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be 28 dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI Page 1 of 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 7 /s/ Mark F. Anderson (w/consent) Mark F. Anderson Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP 600 California Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-2711 Telephone: 415-651-1951 Fax: 415-956-3233 E-Mail: mark@aoblawyers.com 8 Counsel for Faye S. Zylka 3 Date: August 16, 2012 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Date: August 16, 2012 s/ Angela L. Hamm William R. Brown Esq. (IN #26782-48) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: wbrown@schuckitlaw.com ahamm@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan Wolf, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppanwolf@rbg-law.com Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI Page 2 of 3 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Faye S. Zylka and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each 3 bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. S 12 13 14 FO H 11 ER LI RT 8 10 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States an Illston Court, Northern District us Judge S District of California NO 7 9 R NIA 08/16/2012 Date: ________________________ DISTRIBUTION TO: Mark F. Anderson, Esq. mark@aoblawyers.com Tomio B. Narita, Esq. tnariat@snllp.com William R. Brown, Esq. wbrown@schuckitlaw.com A 6 UNIT ED 5 RT U O 4 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C Angela M. Taylor, Esq. angelataylor@jonesday.com Sumana Cooppan, Esq. scooppan@rbg-law.com Angela L. Hamm, Esq. ahamm@schuckitlaw.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?