Zylka v. Discover Bank et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union LLC, Trans Union LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 08/16/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2012)
1
6
William R. Brown, Esq. (IN #26782-48)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: wbrown@schuckitlaw.com
ahamm@schuckitlaw.com
7
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
8
12
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan Wolf, Esq. (CSB # 267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppanwolf@rbg-law.com
13
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
FAYE S. ZYLKA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DISCOVER BANK; TRANS UNION, LLC; and
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-01589-SI
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC ONLY
24
25
Plaintiff Faye S. Zylka, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”),
26
by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been
27
compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be
28
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI
Page 1 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
7
/s/ Mark F. Anderson (w/consent)
Mark F. Anderson
Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP
600 California Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-2711
Telephone: 415-651-1951
Fax: 415-956-3233
E-Mail: mark@aoblawyers.com
8
Counsel for Faye S. Zylka
3
Date: August 16, 2012
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Date: August 16, 2012
s/ Angela L. Hamm
William R. Brown Esq. (IN #26782-48)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: wbrown@schuckitlaw.com
ahamm@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan Wolf, Esq. (CSB #
267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppanwolf@rbg-law.com
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI
Page 2 of 3
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is
2
dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Faye S. Zylka and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each
3
bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
S
12
13
14
FO
H
11
ER
LI
RT
8
10
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States an Illston Court, Northern
District
us
Judge S
District of California
NO
7
9
R NIA
08/16/2012
Date: ________________________
DISTRIBUTION TO:
Mark F. Anderson, Esq.
mark@aoblawyers.com
Tomio B. Narita, Esq.
tnariat@snllp.com
William R. Brown, Esq.
wbrown@schuckitlaw.com
A
6
UNIT
ED
5
RT
U
O
4
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Angela M. Taylor, Esq.
angelataylor@jonesday.com
Sumana Cooppan, Esq.
scooppan@rbg-law.com
Angela L. Hamm, Esq.
ahamm@schuckitlaw.com
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:12-CV-01589-SI
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?