Sony Electronics Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 52

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting re 49 (7992) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Stipulation of Dismissal of AU Optronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. America filed by Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Sony Electronics, Inc.. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013) Modified on 6/13/2013 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Steven V. Bomse (Bar No. 40686) sbomse@orrick.com David M. Goldstein (Bar No. 142334) dgoldstein@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 Attorneys for Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION __________________________________________ 13 This Document Relates to: 14 SONY ELECTRONICS INC. and SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 v. Case No. 3:10-cv-05616 SI 12-1599 Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF AU OPTRONICS CORP. AND AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA AU OPTRONICS CORP.; AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA; SHARP CORP.; and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP., Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF AU OPTRONICS CORP. and AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA – Case No. 12-1599, MDL No. 1827 1 2 The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 3 4 1. All claims asserted by Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony Computer Entertainment 5 America LLC against AU Optronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. America in the 6 underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 8 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6//10 Dated: ________________, 2013 _______________________________ Honorable Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF AU OPTRONICS CORP. and AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA – Case No. 12-1599, MDL No. 1827

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?