Sony Electronics Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8197) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Stipulation of Dismissal of Sharp Corp. and Sharp Electronics Corp. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Steven V. Bomse (Bar No. 40686)
[e-mail]
David M. Goldstein (Bar No. 142334)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony Computer
Entertainment America, LLC

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
__________________________________________

13

This Document Relates to:

14

SONY ELECTRONICS INC. and SONY
COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC,

15

17
18
19
20

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827 SI

Plaintiffs,

16

Case No. 3:12-cv-01599 SI

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF
SHARP CORPORATION AND
SHARP ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION

AU OPTRONICS CORP.; AU OPTRONICS CORP.
AMERICA; SHARP CORP.; and SHARP
ELECTRONICS CORP.,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF SHARP CORPORATION AND
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION – Case No. 12-1599, MDL No. 1827

1
2

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:

3
4

1. All claims asserted by Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony Computer Entertainment

5

America LLC against Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation in the

6

underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

7

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

8

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
6/27
Dated: ________________, 2013

_______________________________
Honorable Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF SHARP CORPORATION AND
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION – Case No. 12-1599, MDL No. 1827