Genetic Technologies Limited v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/21/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
11
12
GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
an Australian corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-01616-RS
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
19
20
21
22
23
24
On this day, came on to be considered the Substitution of Counsel of Defendant
Agilent Technologies, Inc. After considering said motion, the Court is of the opinion that said
Substitution should be GRANTED.
IT IS, THERFORE, ORDERED that Robert J. Goldman may appear as substitute
counsel in place of Sasha G. Rao as attorney of record for Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc.
in the above referenced matter.
25
26
27
21
Dated: May __, 2013
______________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Case No. 3:12-cv-01616-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?