Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Filing
18
ORDER extending page limit re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by ConAgra Foods, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/7/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2012)
Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document17 Filed06/04/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: + 1 (650) 463-4000
Facsimile: + 1 (650) 463-4199
robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com
Douglas M. Schwab (Bar No. 43083)
Benjamin T. Diggs (Bar No. 245904)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4 Embarcadero Ctr., 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: + 1 (415) 374-2301
Facsimile: + 1 (415) 374-2499
douglas.schwab@hoganlovells.com
benjamin.diggs@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
LEVI JONES, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
Case No. 12-cv-1633-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT
FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT;
CASE NO. 12-cv-1633-CRB
Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document17 Filed06/04/12 Page2 of 3
1
WHEREAS on April 2, 2012, plaintiff Levi Jones ("Plaintiff") filed a Class Action and
2
Representative Action Complaint for Damages, Equitable and Injunctive Relief ("Complaint")
3
against defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. ("ConAgra"); and
4
5
6
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation extending ConAgra’s deadline to respond
to the Complaint, ConAgra’s response to the Complaint is due on or before June 11, 2012; and
WHEREAS, ConAgra has determined that it will file a Motion to Dismiss in response to
7
the Complaint and has done substantial work on a draft of that Motion and supporting
8
memorandum;
9
WHEREAS, because of the length and nature of the Complaint (210 paragraphs, 43 pages
10
plus exhibits, asserting nine separate legal claims concerning three separate ConAgra product
11
lines), ConAgra has concluded that it will need an additional 10 pages for its Motion to Dismiss
12
in order to fairly raise the issues in response that it believes should be raised; and
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not oppose an extension of the page limit for the memorandum
in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to 25 pages;
WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose a corresponding extension of the page limit for
Plaintiff’s Opposition memorandum to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to 25 pages;
17
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their
18
respective counsel of record, that, subject to the Court’s approval, the page limits for the briefing
19
on Defendant’s anticipated Motion to Dismiss should be as follows:
20
(a) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss memorandum shall not exceed 25 pages; and
21
(b) Plaintiff’s Opposition memorandum to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall not
22
exceed 25 pages.
23
24
25
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 4, 2012
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
26
27
By:
28
/s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk
Attorneys for Defendant
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT;
CASE NO. 12-cv-1633-CRB
Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document17 Filed06/04/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
Dated: June 4, 2012
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
3
By:
4
/s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI JONES
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, the page limits for the
briefing on Defendant’s anticipated Motion to Dismiss will be as follows:
(a) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed 25 pages; and
(b) Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed 25 pages.
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Honorable Charles R. BreyerRED
RDE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IS SO O
IT
19
harle
Judge C
22
A
H
ER
LI
RT
21
yer
s R. Bre
NO
20
R NIA
18
UNIT
ED
17
June 7
Dated: _________ , 2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
16
S
15
FO
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
I, Robert B. Hawk, attest that Ben F. Pierce Gore has read and approved the Stipulation
25
and [Proposed] Order Extending Page Limit For Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Class Action
26
Complaint and consents to its filing in this action.
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT;
CASE NO. 12-cv-1633-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?