Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE filed by ConAgra Foods, Inc.. Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Responses due by 7/6/2012. Replies due by 7/20/2012.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/18/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)

Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document21 Filed06/12/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: + 1 [phone]
Facsimile: + 1 [phone]
[e-mail]
Douglas M. Schwab (Bar No. 43083))
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4 Embarcadero Ctr., 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: + 1 [phone]
Facsimile: + 1 [phone]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

Robin Wechkin (pro hac vice app. pending)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
8426 316th Pl. SE
Issaquah, Washington 98027
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

LEVI JONES, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,

20

Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24

Case No. 12-cv-1633-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

v.
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.,

Date: August 10, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor

Defendant.
The Hon. Charles R. Breyer

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
CASE NO. 12-cv-1633-CRB

Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document21 Filed06/12/12 Page2 of 3

Plaintiff Levi Jones (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. (“Defendant” or
“ConAgra”), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following
1
2

stipulation, based on the recitals below:
1. On April 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Class Action and Representative Action Complaint

3
4

for Damages, Equitable and Injunctive Relief (“Complaint”);
2. The parties filed a Stipulation re Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint,

5
6

extending the deadline to June 11, 2012;
3. On June 11, 2012, ConAgra filed its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, noticing the

7

motion for hearing on August 10, 2012, the same day as the initial Case Management

8

Conference is calendared

9

4. In order to permit themselves more time to brief the issues raised by ConAgra’s

10

Motion to Dismiss and to accommodate counsel’s calendars, the parties have agreed,

11

subject to Court approval, to a briefing schedule in connection with the Motion to

12

Dismiss whereby the deadline for each party’s filing is altered from the deadline that

13

would otherwise be required by the Local Rules;

14

5. The proposed briefing schedule is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay;

15

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective

16
17
18
19
20

counsel, that:
1.

Plaintiffs’ Opposition papers to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed no

later than July 6, 2012; and
2.

Defendant’s Reply papers shall be filed no later than July 20, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22

Dated: June 12, 2012

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

23
24

By:

25

/s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk
Attorneys for Defendant
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
CASE NO. 12-CV-1633-CRB

Case3:12-cv-01633-CRB Document21 Filed06/12/12 Page3 of 3

Dated: June 12 , 2012

PRATT & ASSOCIATES
By:

1
2

/s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI JONES

3
4

ORDER

5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, the due dates for the

6

briefing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, noticed for hearing on August 10, 2012, are:

7

1.

Plaintiffs’ Opposition papers shall be filed no later than July 6, 2012;

8

2.

Defendant’s Reply papers shall be filed no later than July 20, 2012.

9
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Charles R. Breyer
DERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SO OR
S

J

ER

H

17
18

R NIA
FO

RT

16

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

15

IT I

LI

14

UNIT
ED

13

Dated: _________ , 2012
June 18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

12

S

11

A

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
CASE NO. 12-CV-1633-CRB