Collier v. The Vallejo Water Co.
Filing
31
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
13
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. C 12-1635 SI
DONALD T. COLLIER,
v.
THE VALLEJO WATER CO., et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
On August 24, 2012, this case was reassigned to this Court. The docket in this case shows that
16
on August 20, 2012, defendant County of Solano filed a motion to dismiss, and on August 23, 2012,
17
defendant City of Vallejo filed a motion to dismiss. Pro se plaintiff Donald Collier’s oppositions to
18
those motions were due on September 6, 2012, and September 10, 2012, respectively. Plaintiff did not
19
file any oppositions, nor did plaintiff request an extension of time.
20
Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than September 27,
21
2012, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ.
22
Proc. 41(b). If plaintiff responds to this Order and wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, the Court will
23
set a new briefing schedule and hearing date on defendants’ motions to dismiss. The September 28,
24
2012 hearing date is VACATED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: September 13, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?