Goodes et al v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Filing 66

ORDER granting 59 MOTION Administrative Relief (Reinstatement of Parties' Motions on the Standard of Review) filed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 63 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to deny Administrative Relief filed by Diana Goodes. Motions continued to 4/12/13, at 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/13/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kathleen Cahill Slaught (SBN 168129)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Michelle M. Scannell (SBN 267767)
E-mail: [e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
COMPANY GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO

11
12

WILLIAM GOODES and DIANA GOODES,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendant.

17
18
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 12 1667 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS &
ELECTRIC COMPANY GROUP LIFE
INSURANCE AND LONG TERM
DISABILITY PLAN’S NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
REINSTATE THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS
ON THE STANDARD OF REVIEW
(DOCKET NOS. 48 AND 50)

21
22

Having reviewed Pacific Gas & Electric Company Group Life Insurance and Long Term

23

Disability Plan’s (“Plan”) Motion for Administrative Relief to Reinstate the Parties’ Motions on

24

the Standard of Review (Docket Nos. 48 and 50), the Declarations of Kathleen Cahill Slaught

25

and Michelle Scannell in support thereof, and the pleadings and papers on file in this action, the

26

Court makes the following findings, and good cause appearing, makes the following order:

27
28

The Court shall reinstate the parties’ motions filed on December 6 and 7, 2012,
respectively, for the Court’s consideration.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
REINSTATE THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS ON THE STANDARD OF REVIEW / CASE NO. CV 12 1667 SI

1
2
3

The briefing schedule for the Plan’s motion on the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ claims
outlined in the November 15, 2012 Civil Pretrial Minutes is modified as follows:
The Plan’s motion on the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ claim filed by March 8, 2013;

4

Plaintiffs’ Opposition Due on March 22, 2013 and the Plan’s Reply due on March 29, 2013.

5

Hearing on motion regarding timeliness of Plaintiffs’ claims scheduled for April 12, 2013, which

6

is the same date as the continued Case Management Conference.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10
11

DATED: February 13

, 2013

_____________________________________
Honorable District Court Judge Susan Illston

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
REINSTATE THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS ON THE STANDARD OF REVIEW / CASE NO. CV 12 1667 SI