Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 110

ORDER GRANTING BRANDYWINE'S MOTION TO FILE SUR-REPLY by Judge William Alsup [granting 105 Motion for Leave to File]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
No. C 12-01669 WHA
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14
15

ORDER GRANTING
BRANDYWINE’S MOTION
TO FILE SUR-REPLY

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
/

16
17

Plaintiff Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, seeks leave to file a sur-reply

18

to Cisco’s motion to enforce the case management order. This order finds good cause to allow a

19

sur-reply because it clarifies factual inaccuracies in Cisco’s reply brief. As such, Brandywine’s

20

motion to file a sur-reply is GRANTED.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 6, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE