Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 110

ORDER GRANTING BRANDYWINE'S MOTION TO FILE SUR-REPLY by Judge William Alsup [granting 105 Motion for Leave to File]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, No. C 12-01669 WHA Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 ORDER GRANTING BRANDYWINE’S MOTION TO FILE SUR-REPLY CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. / 16 17 Plaintiff Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, seeks leave to file a sur-reply 18 to Cisco’s motion to enforce the case management order. This order finds good cause to allow a 19 sur-reply because it clarifies factual inaccuracies in Cisco’s reply brief. As such, Brandywine’s 20 motion to file a sur-reply is GRANTED. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 6, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?