Anderson v. Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.,
Filing
30
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, defendant must file a responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint no later than March 22, 2013. Given the limited nature of the amendments and defendant's having been aware of said amendments no later than January 17, 2013, however, such extension shall not constitute good cause to amend the Pretrial Preparation Order in any manner. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Deborah J. Broyles (SBN 167681)
Email: dbroyles@reedsmith.com
Tiffany Renee Thomas (SBN 239085)
Email: tthomas@reedsmith.com
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: +1 415 543 8700
Facsimile:
+1 415 391 8269
Attorneys for Defendant
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
15
JACQUELINE ANDERSON,
No.: 3:12-cv-01682-MMC
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANT CHARLES
SCHWAB & CO., INC.’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
vs.
CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY, INC.,
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
US_ACTIVE-112283201.1-TTHOMAS 03/13/2013 3:13 PM
1
2
3
4
5
6
Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
(“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 11, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
seeking leave for Plaintiff’s filing of a Third Amended Complaint [Doc 19];
WHEREAS, on January 15, 2013, this Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended
Complaint [Doc. 20];
7
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint [Doc. 21];
8
WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint contains 270 separate and distinct paragraphs;
9
WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file an answer to the Third Amended Complaint;
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to, and the court granted, an extension of Defendant’s time
to file its answer to March 1, 2013 [Docs. 22, 24]
WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to, and the court granted, an extension of Defendant’s time
to file its answer to March 15, 2013 [Docs. 22, 24]
14
WHEREAS, Defendant will be unable to complete its Answer by March 15, 2013;
15
WHEREAS, an extension of time will not affect the case management schedule for this
16
17
18
action; and
WHEREAS, the instant Stipulation and [Proposed] Order constitutes the parties’ third
request for a time modification in this action.
19
20
21
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff and
Defendant that:
22
Pursuant to this stipulation, the parties agree to continue Defendant’s deadline to file its
23
responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint from March 1, 2013 to March 22, 2013.
24
25
SO STIPULATED.
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
2
DATED: March 13, 2013
REED SMITH, LLP
3
By: /s/ Tiffany Renee Thomas
Deborah J. Broyles
Tiffany Renee Thomas
Attorneys for Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
4
5
6
7
DATED: March 13, 2013
Law Offices of Murlene J. Randle
8
By: /s/ Murlene J. Randle
Murlene J. Randle
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
18
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
19
ORDERED THAT Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. must file a responsive pleading to
20
22
Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson’s Third Amended Complaint no later than March 22, 2013. Given the
limited nature of the amendments and defendant's having been aware of said amendments no later
than January 17, 2013, however, such extension shall not constitute good cause to amend the Pretrial
Preparation Order in any manner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated: ____________
March 18, 2013
21
24
25
26
27
_____________________________________
The Honorable Maxine Chesney
United States District Judge
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?