Graebner et al v. James et al

Filing 67

ORDER RE SEALING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/12/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

E. BERTITA TRABERT GRAEBNER, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER RE SEALING

MICHAEL E. JAMES, et al.,
Defendants.
/

14
15

No. C 12-01694 WHA

It appears that plaintiffs have filed a number of redacted exhibits in connection with their

16

opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment; however, no motion to seal has been

17

filed. Pursuant to Local Rules 79-5 and 7-11, plaintiffs must file an administrative motion to

18

seal that clearly identifies the exhibits or portions of exhibits they seek to file under seal and

19

provides specific reasons establishing that they are properly sealable. As stated in Local Rule

20

79-5, “the request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and must

21

conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(b) or (c).” Additionally, it appears that the redacted portions in the

22

exhibits currently e-filed on the public docket are not identified, e.g., by noting each sealed

23

portion as “redacted.” Plaintiffs must file an administrative motion to seal by NOON ON JULY 15.

24

The documents will remain provisionally sealed until further order of the Court.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: July 12, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE