Mount Hamilton Partners LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 126

ORDER, Motions terminated: (125 in 3:12-cv-01698-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re (124) Order, Terminate Motions, Set Hearings,,,,,, CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Groupon, Inc.. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/22/13 is continued to 12/6/2013 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/16/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)

1 James T. Hultquist (pro hac vice)
2
3
4
5

[e-mail]
Khurram N. Gore (pro hac vice)
Adrian Shin (CA State Bar No. 256960)
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
Attorneys for Defendant

7 GROUPON, INC.

8 James F. Valentine, CA SB# 149269
9 [e-mail]
James C. Pistorino, CA SB# 226496

10 [e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP

11 3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

12 Telephone: [phone]
13 Facsimile: 650.838.4350

Jenna F. Karadbil
[e-mail]
California State Bar No. 213574
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN LLP
1540 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Callie A. Bjurstrom
[e-mail]
California State Bar No. 137816
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN LLP
501 West Broadway
San Diego, California 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC

14 Attorneys for Defendant
15

GOOGLE, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC,

20
21
22

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
v.

23 GOOGLE, INC.,
24

Case No. 3:12-CV-1698-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[Civ. L.R. 6-2 & 7-12]

Defendant/Counterclaimant.

25
26
27
28
Case Nos. C-12-1698 and C-12-1700
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC,
2

Case No. 3:12-CV-1700-SI

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,

3
v.

4
5

GROUPON, INC.,

6

Defendant/Counterclaimant.

7
8
9

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC (“MHP” or

10 “Plaintiff”) and Defendants1 Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon”) and Google, Inc. (“Google”)
11 (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby jointly
12 move the Court for an order continuing the scheduled date for a Further Case Management
13 Conference, for the following reasons:
14

1.

Pursuant to this Court’s October 4, 2013 Order Continuing Further Case

15 Management Conference (Dkt. No. 93), the parties are scheduled to participate in a Further Case
16 Management Conference on November 22, 2013.
17

2.

Due to scheduling conflicts, counsel for Groupon is unavailable the week of

18 November 22, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff and Google join in the request for continuing the date
19 for the Further Case Management Conference to the next available date on the Court’s calendar.
20

3.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and request the Court to continue the

21 Further Case Management Conference from November 22 to December 6, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. or
22 such other date and time that is agreeable with the Court’s calendar. The requested continuance
23 does not affect any other deadline ordered by the Court.
24
25
26
1

The two above captioned cases (Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC v. Google Inc., Case No. 3:12-

27 cv-1698-SI (“Google case”); Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv28 1700-SI (“Groupon case”)) were consolidated for claim construction purposes only.
Case Nos. C-12-1698 and C-12-1700
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2 Dated: October 15, 2013

By:

3
4

/s/ Callie Bjurstrom
CALLIE A. BJURSTROM
JENNA F. KARADBIL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC

5
6
7

Dated: October 15, 2013

8
By:

9
10
11

/s/ Adrian Shin
JAMES T. HULTQUIST
KHURRAM NASIR GORE
ADRIAN SHIN
Attorneys for Defendant
GROUPON, INC.

12
13
14 Dated: October 15, 2013
15

By:

16
17

/s/ Victoria Q. Smith
JAMES F. VALENTINE
VICTORIA Q. SMITH
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
10/16
22 Dated: ___________, 2013

23
24
25

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28
Case Nos. C-12-1698 and C-12-1700
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

1
2
3

I, Adrian Shin, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

4 Dated: October 15, 2013

REED SMITH LLP

5
6
7
8

By: /s/ Adrian Shin
Adrian Shin
Attorneys for Defendant
GROUPON, INC.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case Nos. C-12-1698 and C-12-1700
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE