Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al

Filing 78

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting 71 administrative motion to return documents to administrative record. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 DOUGLAS B. POWELL, 6 7 8 NO. 12-1705 TEH Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RETURN CERTAIN ITEMS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 9 Defendants. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 On June 6, 2013, the Court granted, as unopposed, Plaintiff Douglas B. Powell’s 13 administrative motion to remove certain items from the administrative record in this case. 14 Now, Defendants have filed their own administrative motion requesting that the Court 15 reconsider its June 6, 2013, ruling and return to the record the items that were removed. 16 Because the Court’s docket entry displayed an incorrect deadline for Defendants’ opposition 17 to Powell’s administrative motion, the Court excuses Defendants’ failure to timely file an 18 opposition to Powell’s motion. Having reviewed the papers filed in connection with 19 Defendants’ administrative motion to reconsider and Powell’s opposition thereto, the Court 20 finds that the documents that were removed pursuant to the June 6, 2013, order are properly 21 part of the administrative record in this case and GRANTS Defendants’ motion. 22 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, on or before July 1, 2013, Powell shall file 23 under seal the following surveillance videos and photographs as part of the administrative 24 record in this case: Bates Nos. 2075, 2077, 2313, 2315, 2761, 2763, 3856, and 3857. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: 6/27/2013 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?