Hogue v. M+W U.S., Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE. Opposition is due November 2, 2012; reply is due November 16, 2012. The hearing is continued to November 30, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)

1

5

Scott D. Gattey (SBN 180875)
[e-mail]
Aaron Thacker (SBN 239946)
[e-mail]
Gattey Law Office
939 Laurel Street , Suite D
San Carlos, CA 94070
Telephone.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff Phillip Hogue

7

11

ROBERT JOSEPH PIA (SBN 115179)
[e-mail]
JACK PRAETZELLIS (SBN 267765)
[e-mail]
MBV LAW LLP
855 Front Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendant M+W U.S., INC.

2
3
4

8
9
10

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

PHILIP HOGUE, an individual,

18
19
20

CASE NO. C-12-1712 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER
VENUE

Plaintiff,
v.
M+W U.S., Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
DOES 1-10,

AND ORDER THEREON

21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. C-12-1712 MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS the parties met at mediation on October 4, 2012, and are currently

2

negotiating the final terms of a settlement agreement that would document a settlement of this

3

matter; and

4

WHEREAS Defendant, prior to mediation, filed its Motion to Transfer Venue, which is

5

currently set to be heard on November 16, 2012 and the opposition to which is currently due on

6

October 19, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the parties believe that an extension of the hearing date and related

7
8
9

deadlines would serve the interest of an efficient resolution of this case, as there would be no
need for the motion if the matter is resolved by settlement as anticipated;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant

10
that:
11
12

• the deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue
should be reset for November 2, 2012;

13

• the deadline for Defendant’s Reply should be reset for November 16, 2012; and

14

• the hearing should be reset for November 30, 2012.

15
16

Dated: October 12, 2012

GATTEY LAW OFFICE

17
18

By: /s/ Scott D. Gattey

19

Scott D. Gattey
Attorney for Plaintiff Phillip Hogue

20
21

Dated: October 12, 2012

MBV LAW LLP

22
23

By: /s/ Robert Joseph Pia

24

Robert Joseph Pia
Attorney for Defendant
M+W U.S., Inc.

25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. C-12-1712 MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45 §X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury
that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

6
7

Dated: October 12, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

8
By: /s/ Scott D. Gattey

9

Scott D. Gattey
Attorney for Plaintiff Phillip Hogue

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
CASE NO. C-12-1712 MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

1
2

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:

3
4

1. The deadline for the filing of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to

5

Transfer Venue is reset for November 2, 2012;

6

2. the deadline for Defendant’s Reply is reset for November 16, 2012; and

7

3. the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue is reset for November

8

30, 2012.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

October 16, 2012
Dated:_____________________________
Hon. Maxine Chesney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
CASE NO. C-12-1712 MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER