Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al
STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Twitter, Inc. filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Graves, Charles) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation,
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-1721 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation;
and JAMES KESTER, an individual,
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline
other requested deadline
30 days after close of discovery
Dated: August 6, 2012
/s Charles T. Graves
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: August 9, 2012
/s Douglas Woodruff Colt
Attorney for Defendants
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I, Charles T. Graves, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process. In compliance with
General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Douglas Woodruff Colt has concurred in this filing.
DATED: August 10, 2012
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
s/Charles T. Graves
Charles T. Graves
Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?