Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 55

STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Twitter, Inc. filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Graves, Charles) (Filed on 8/10/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. 3:12-cv-1721 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation; and JAMES KESTER, an individual, Defendants. _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline  other requested deadline 30 days after close of discovery Dated: August 6, 2012 /s Charles T. Graves Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: August 9, 2012 /s Douglas Woodruff Colt Attorney for Defendants CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER ☐ ☐ Dated: The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATION I, Charles T. Graves, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Douglas Woodruff Colt has concurred in this filing. DATED: August 10, 2012 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: s/Charles T. Graves Charles T. Graves Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?