Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 58

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 55 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. 3:12-cv-1721 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation; and JAMES KESTER, an individual, Defendants. _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline  other requested deadline 30 days after close of discovery Dated: August 6, 2012 /s Charles T. Graves Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: August 9, 2012 /s Douglas Woodruff Colt Attorney for Defendants CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O R NIA THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE S NO ston usan Ill H LI RT ER FO Judge S A Dated: 08/13/2012 S DISTRICT TE C __________________________________ TA UNIT ED ☐ ☐ N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?