Johnson et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/8/2013. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN 69888
ADANTÉ D. POINTER Esq. SBN 236229
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Vernesta Johnson, Rubina Munaf,
Guardian Ad Litem of S.M.

8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17

VERNESTA JOHNSON, individually and as the
personal representative of the ESTATE OF
ARTHUR RALEIGH; RUBINA MUNAF,
individually and as the Guardian Ad Litem of
S.M.; and the ESTATE OF ARTHUR
RALEIGH

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-01725 LB

REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity;
ANTHONY BATTS, in his official capacity as
Chief of Police for the CITY OF OAKLAND;
BRYAN FRANKS, individually and in his
official capacity as a police officer for CITY OF
OAKLAND; JAMES PULSIPHER, individually
and in his official capacity as police officer for
the CITY OF OAKLAND and DOES 1-50,
inclusive.
Defendants.

27
28

REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION
-1

1
2

Pursuant to the fully executed Settlement Agreement and Release, Plaintiffs, VERNESTA

3

JOHNSON, individually and as the personal representative of the ESTATE OF ARTHUR

4

RALEIGH; RUBINA MUNAF, individually and as the Guardian Ad Litem of S.M.; hereby

5

respectfully request that this action be dismissed with prejudice as provided for under FRCP 41(a)(2).

6
7

Plaintiff RUBINA MUNAF as guardian ad litem for S.M. intends to submit a Petition to
Compromise SM’S Claims for Court approval within the next 30 days.

8
9

DATED: August 7, 2013

10
11

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

12
13
14
15

By: ______/s/___________________

ADANTE D. POINTER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION
-2

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice.
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: August 8, 2013

8

_____________________________

9

HONORABLE LAUREL BEELER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION
-3

_______