AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. v. Integral Consulting, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY HEARING (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure,
Inc.,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No. 12-cv-01735 SC (NC)
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
CONTINUE DISCOVERY HEARING

v.
Integral Consulting, Inc., Edward P.
Conti, an individual, Matthew
Hillyard, an individual,
Defendants.
On September 17, 2013, Integral filed a notice of unavailability for the discovery

20

hearing set for September 25, 2013. Dkt. No. 42. Although Integral did not move the

21

Court to continue the hearing, the Court treats Integral’s notice as a request to do so. In its

22

letter filed September 19, 2013, AMEC requested that Integral be available at the hearing

23

or in the alternative, not oppose the requested extension to the mediation deadline. Dkt.

24

No. 44. Integral’s request to continue the hearing is DENIED, as it lacks good cause. If

25

Integral wishes to modify the schedule, counsel should file a stipulation proposing

26

alternative dates, or a motion supported by good cause and demonstrating that counsel

27

have met and conferred on the scheduling issue.

28
CASE NO. 12-CV-01735 SC (NC)

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED

3

Dated: September 20, 2013

4
5
HONORABLE NATHANAEL COUSINS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF602748

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANDING AMEC’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY

NO. C