David et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 7/18/2012.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/6/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ASHLEY V. DAVID, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 12-01752 JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
GMAC MORTGAGE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
On June 13, 2012, Defendant GMAC Mortgage filed a motion to dismiss, which is
16
noticed for a hearing on August 10, 2012. On June 14, 2012, Defendants Tyneia G. Merrit and
17
Merrit Law, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss, which also is noticed for a hearing on August 10,
18
2012.
19
Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, and the Defendants served their motions to dismiss by
20
U.S. Mail. Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rules 7-3(a) and 5-5(a), Plaintiffs’
21
opposition briefs to each of the Defendants’ motions were due on July 2, 2012. Plaintiffs have
22
not filed an opposition to either motion.
23
Plaintiffs are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be
24
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs’ response to this Order to Show Cause shall be due
25
by no later than July 18, 2012. If Plaintiffs seek to file belated opposition briefs to the
26
Defendants’ motions, they must show good cause for such a request and submit proposed
27
opposition briefs with that request by no later than July 18, 2012. If the Court grants Plaintiffs
28
leave to file belated opposition briefs, it shall set a deadline for Defendants to file replies.
1
2
3
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pending further order of the Court, the hearing on on
the motions to dismiss remain on calendar on August 10, 2012.
Plaintiffs are HEREBY ADVISED that if they fail to file a response to this Order to
4
Show Cause, or fail to file a request to submit belated opposition briefs, by July 18, 2012, the
5
Court SHALL dismiss this case with prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiffs for failure
6
to prosecute.
7
Finally, the Court HEREBY ADVISES Plaintiffs that the Handbook for Pro Se
through the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiffs that they
10
also may wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Plaintiff may call the Legal Help
11
For the Northern District of California
Litigants, which contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available
9
United States District Court
8
Center at 415-782-9000, extension 8657, or sign up on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room
12
2796, for a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but
13
not legal representation.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: July 6, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ASHLEY et al,
Case Number: CV12-01752 JSW
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
DAVID-V-GMAC MORTGAGE et al,
9
Defendant.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 6, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
17
18
19
Ashley V. David
5417 Summerfield Drive
Antioch, CA 94531
Nosheen David
5417 Summerfield Drive
Antioch, CA 94531
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 6, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?