Collins v. Duracell, Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by James Collins , The Gillette Company, and The Procter & Gamble Company filed by James Collins, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 7/11/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES COLLINS, Individually
and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated

,
Plaintiff(s),

v.
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and THE
,
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

CV 12-1778 EDL
CASE NO. ______________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private mediation to be

9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
selected by the agreement of all parties.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

9

90 days after the date of the Court's ruling on class certification
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

6/10/12
Dated:___________

s/ Noah M. Schubert
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff

6/10/12
Dated:____________

s/ Darren K. Cottriel
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

Dated: July 11, 2012

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

RT
U
O

S

9

R NIA

9
XX

__________________________________

A

H

ER

LI

RT

FO

NO

MAGISTRATE
porte
UNITED STATESaMAGISTRATE JUDGE
h D. La
Eliz bet
Judge

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2