Collins v. Duracell, Inc. et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER Modifying Schedule for Expert Discovery and Class Certification re 31 : Motions due by 3/5/2013. Responses due by 4/5/2013. Replies due by 4/19/2013. Motion Hearing set for 5/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 11/9/2012. (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
Case3:12-cv-01778-EDL Document31 Filed11/08/12 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
ROBERT C. SCHUBERT (No. 62684)
MIRANDA P. KOLBE (No. 214392)
NOAH M. SCHUBERT (No. 278696)
SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Three Embarcadero Ctr Ste 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111-4018
Telephone: 415-788-4220
Facsimile: 415-788-0161
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
JAMES COLLINS, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Case No. CV-12-1778-EDL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE
FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY AND
CLASS CERTIFICATION
AS MODIFIED
Civ. L.R. 6-2, 7-12
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
"
#
!"#
S CHUBERT J ONCKHEER & K OLBE LLP
8
v.
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and THE
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,
16
Defendants.
17
18
1.
Plaintiff commenced this putative class action against defendants The
19
Gillette Company and The Proctor and Gamble Company (collectively “Defendants”) on
20
April 10, 2012. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated California Business and
21
Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. and California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq. with regard
22
to product claims concerning Duracell Ultra Advanced and Duracell Ultra Power
23
batteries. Defendants deny Plaintiff’s claims have any merit.
24
2.
On August 8, 2012, the Court issued its Case Management and Pretrial
25
Order, setting, inter alia, deadlines for the exchange of expert reports and the
26
completion of expert discovery regarding class certification and deadlines to file and
27
brief the class certification motion. (Docket No. 25.)
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
Case No.: CV-12-1778-EDL
Case3:12-cv-01778-EDL Document31 Filed11/08/12 Page2 of 5
1
3.
The parties met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26(f) on July 9, 2012, and
served document requests and interrogatories on Defendants. On August 1, 2012, the
5
parties exchanged initial disclosures, and on August 8, 2012, the Court issued its Case
6
Management and Pretrial Order (“Case Management Order”). By stipulation among the
7
parties, Plaintiff served responses and objections to Defendants’ document requests and
8
interrogatories on September 6, 2012, followed by supplemental responses and
9
objections on October 22, 2012, and Defendants served responses and objections to
10
Plaintiff’s document requests and interrogatories on September 13, 2012. The parties
11
!"#
document requests and interrogatories on Plaintiff, and on July 20, 2012, Plaintiff
4
also stipulated to a Protective Order governing the handling of confidential documents
12
and their disclosure to expert witnesses, which was entered by the Court on September
13
13, 2012. (Docket No. 30.)
14
4.
The Case Management Order requires Plaintiff to file his expert report(s)
15
for class certification by November 15, 2012, Defendants to file their expert report(s) for
16
class certification by December 14, 2012, and Plaintiff to file his rebuttal expert report(s)
17
for class certification by January 15, 2013. All expert discovery for class certification
18
must be completed by February 1, 2013. Plaintiff must also file his class certification
19
motion by February 19, 2013, and the class certification hearing is set for April 23, 2013.
"
#
discovery commenced promptly thereafter. On July 12, 2012, Defendants served
3
S CHUBERT J ONCKHEER & K OLBE LLP
2
20
5.
In light of ongoing discovery and depositions being conducted by the
21
parties in the case and after having met and conferred, the parties agree to extend these
22
expert discovery and class certification deadlines.
23
24
6.
The parties agree to the following schedule for expert discovery related to
Plaintiff’s motion for Class Certification:
25
■ Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures/Report(s): December 31, 2012
26
■ Defendant’s Expert Disclosures/Report(s): February 4, 2013
27
■ Plaintiff’s Rebuttal Expert Report(s): February 18, 2013
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
Case No.: CV-12-1778-EDL
Case3:12-cv-01778-EDL Document31 Filed11/08/12 Page3 of 5
■ Close of Expert Discovery for Class Certification: March 1, 2013
1
2
7.
The parties agree to the following schedule for Class Certification:
3
■ Plaintiff shall file Class Certification motion by March 5, 2013
4
■ Defendants shall file opposition to class certification by April 5, 2013
5
■ Plaintiff shall file reply to defendant’s opposition by April 19, 2013
6
■ Court hearing on Plaintiff's motion for class certification: May 7, 2013
7
8.
The parties agree that all other deadlines in the Court’s Case Management
Order would remain unchanged. The parties believe that this proposed schedule will
9
ensure the efficient, orderly, and complete litigation of expert discovery and class
10
certification issues raised in this action.
11
12
13
DATED: November 8, 2012
SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
BY:
14
15
"
#
!"#
S CHUBERT J ONCKHEER & K OLBE LLP
8
16
17
18
19
/S/
NOAH M. SCHUBERT (NO. 278696)
Robert C. Schubert
rschubert@schubertlawfirm.com
Miranda P. Kolbe
mkolbe@schubertlawfirm.com
Noah M. Schubert
nschubert@schubertlawfirm.com
21
Three Embarcadero Ctr Ste 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111-4018
Telephone: 415-788-4220
Facsimile: 415-788-0161
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
20
23
24
25
26
27
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
Case No.: CV-12-1778-EDL
Case3:12-cv-01778-EDL Document31 Filed11/08/12 Page4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
BY:
/S/
DARREN K. COTTRIEL (NO. 184731)
Darren K. Cottriel
dcottriel@jonesday.com
3161 Michelson Drive, 8th Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: 949-553-7548
Facsimile: 949-553-7539
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (No. 060359)
Jason McDonell (No. 115084)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-626-3939
Facsimile: 415-875-5700
ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com
jmcdonell@jonesday.com
Attorneys for Defendants
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and THE
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
15
"
#
!"#
S CHUBERT J ONCKHEER & K OLBE LLP
10
JONES DAY
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
Case No.: CV-12-1778-EDL
Case3:12-cv-01778-EDL Document31 Filed11/08/12 Page5 of 5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
The Court, having considered the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause
appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS THAT:
1.
The schedule for expert discovery relating to class certification and
5
Plaintiff’s motion for Class Certification set in this Court’s August 8, 2012 Case
6
Management and Pretrial Order is modified as follows:
■ Plaintiff’s Rebuttal Expert Report(s): February 18, 2013
10
■ Close of Expert Discovery for Class Certification: March 1, 2013
11
!"#
■ Defendant’s Expert Disclosures/Report(s): February 4, 2013
9
■ Plaintiff shall file Class Certification motion by March 5, 2013
12
■ Defendants shall file opposition to class certification by April 5, 2013
13
■ Plaintiff shall file reply to defendant’s opposition by April 19, 2013
14
Court hearing on Plaintiff's motion for class certification: May 7, 2013
■
14
15
2.
All other deadlines in this Court’s Case Management Order shall remain
"
#
■ Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures/Report(s): December 31, 2012
8
S CHUBERT J ONCKHEER & K OLBE LLP
7
16
17
unchanged.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
DATED: November 9, 2012
HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
Case No.: CV-12-1778-EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?