Breville Pty Limited et al v. Storebound LLC
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING 44 STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO EXTEND THE LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURE DEADLINES TO FACILITATE MEDIATION. Claims Construction Hearing set for 6/12/2013 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 6/5/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/3/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
Case3:12-cv-01783-JSW Document44 Filed11/30/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
Nathan Lane, III (State Bar # 50961)
Email: nathan.lane@squiresanders.com
Joseph Meckes (Stat Bar # 190279)
Email: joseph.meckes@squiresanders.com
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: +1 415 954 0200
Facsimile: +1 415 393 9887
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Breville Pty Limited and Breville USA, Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY P. WIDMAN
Jeffrey P. Widman (State Bar # 58628)
Email: jpwidman@comcast.net
Timothy D. Widman (State Bar # 189182)
E-mail: tdwidmanesq@comcast.net
101 Race Street, Suite 100
San Jose, California 95126-3041
Telephone: +1 408 288 6777
Facsimile: +1 408 288 7668
Glen M. Diehl (Pro Hac Vice)
DIEHL SERVILLA LLC
33 Wood Avenue South, Second Fl., Ste. 210
Iselin, NJ 08830
Telephone: +1 732 815 0404
Attorneys for Defendant Storebound LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
BREVILLE PTY LIMITED, an Australia
proprietary company, and BREVILLE
USA, INC., a California corporation,
23
24
25
Plaintiff/Counterdefendants,
vs.
26
STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER TO EXTEND
THE LOCAL PATENT RULE
DISCLOSURE DEADLINES TO
FACILITATE MEDIATION; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
STOREBOUND LLC, a New York limited
liability company,
27
Case No. CV-12-01783 JSW
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
Case No. CV-12-1783 JSW
Case3:12-cv-01783-JSW Document44 Filed11/30/12 Page2 of 3
1
To facilitate the Parties’ on-going settlement discussions arising out of a full-day
2
mediation, the Parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2 to continue the
3
dates set by the Court at the case management conference by (35) days.
4
Pursuant to the Court’s Amended Case Management Order [Dkt. 31] and Notice
5
Appointing Mediator [Dkt. 34], the parties participated in court-sponsored mediation before
6
James Gilliland of Kilpatrick Townsend on November 27, 2012. The parties made substantial
7
progress during the mediation and wish to continue to engage in meaningful discussions in an
8
attempt to resolve their differences.
9
Certain deadlines under the Patent Local Rules are approaching. The parties believe that
10
extending these deadlines will facilitate informal resolution of the dispute by permitting the
11
parties to conserve resources. The parties accordingly stipulate and request that the Court modify
12
the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint case management statement [Dkt. 20] and
13
adopted by the Court in the Amended Case Management Order [Dkt. 31] as follows:
14
P.R. 4-2 Exchange of Preliminary Claim
Construction and Extrinsic Evidence
P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
Statement
December 4, 2012
January 8, 2013
December 31, 2012
February 4, 2013
P.R. 4-4 Completion of Claim Construction
Discovery
P.R. 4-5(a) Claim Construction Briefs – Opening
Brief by the party asserting patent infringement
January 31, 2012
March 7, 2013
February 14, 2013
March 21, 2013
P.R. 4-5(b) Claim Construction Briefs – Responsive
Brief by opposing party
February 28, 2013
April 4, 2013
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
P.R. 4-5(c) – Claim Construction Brief – Reply Brief March 7, 2013
by the party asserting patent infringement
File Amended, Final Joint Claim Construction
March 11, 2013
Statement (Judge White Standing Order ¶6)
Technical Tutorial (Judge White Standing Order ¶7) April 9, 2013
April 11, 2013
P.R. 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing
TBD – May 2013
April 16, 2013
April 15, 2013
TBD – May 2013
As to the dates of the Technical Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing, the Parties
26
request that the Court reset the deadline by 35 days or such date that is otherwise convenient to
27
the Court. If the Court were to continue the Technical Tutorial by 35 days, the date set would be
28
May 14, 2013. If the Court were to continue the Claim Construction Hearing by 35 days, the date
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
-1-
Case No. CV-12-1783 JSW
Case3:12-cv-01783-JSW Document44 Filed11/30/12 Page3 of 3
1
set would be May 21, 2013.
2
SO STIPULATED.
3
4
Dated: November 30, 2012
5
By: /s/ Joseph A. Meckes
Joseph A. Meckes
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BREVILLE PTY LIMITED AND
BREVILLE USA, INC.
7
8
9
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
Dated: November 30, 2012
10
By: /s/ Glen Diehl
Glen Diehl
11
Attorneys for Defendant
STOREBOUND LLC
12
13
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
15
Having considered the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
16
grants the parties’ Stipulation to Modify the Case Management Order to Extend the Local Patent
17
Rule Disclosure Deadlines.
18
June 5
The Claim Construction Tutorial shall be held on _______________, 2013 at _____ p.m.
1:30 a.m.
19
June 12
1:30 p.m.
The Claims Construction Hearing shall be held on _______________, 2013 at _____a.m.
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated:
December 3, 2012
Judge Jeffrey S. White
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
-2-
Case No. CV-12-1783 JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?