Breville Pty Limited et al v. Storebound LLC
Filing
72
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Modify Claims Construction Briefing Schedule filed by Breville USA, Inc., Breville Pty Limited. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 22, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
Nathan Lane, III (State Bar # 50961)
Email: nathan.lane@squiresanders.com
Joseph Meckes (Stat Bar # 190279)
Email: joseph.meckes@squiresanders.com
Jeremy Dutra (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: jeremy.dutra@squiresanders.com
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: +1 415 954 0200
Facsimile: +1 415 393 9887
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Breville Pty Limited and Breville USA, Inc.
LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY P. WIDMAN
Jeffrey P. Widman (State Bar #58628)
Email: jpwidman@comcast.net
Timothy D. Widman (State Bar # 189182)
Email: tdwidmanesq@comcast.net
101 Race Street, Suite 100
San Jose, CA 95126-3041
Telephone:
+1 408 288 6777
Facsimile:
+1 408 288 7668
GRAHAM CURTIN, P.A.
Glen Diehl (admitted pro hac vice)
gdiehl@grahamcurtin.com
4 Headquarters Plaza
P.O. Box 1991
Morristown, NJ 07962-1991
Telephone: +1 973 401 7138
Attorneys for Defendant
Storebound LLC
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
BREVILLE PTY LIMITED, an Australia
proprietary company, and BREVILLE
USA, INC., a California Corporation,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
vs.
STOREBOUND LLC, a New York limited
liability company,
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom 9
STIPULATION TO MODIFY CLAIMS
CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
22
Defendant.
Complaint Filed: April 10, 2012
23
24
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
25
26
27
28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
STIPULATION MODIFYING CLAIMS
CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST
1
On April 2, 2013, the Court granted the parties stipulation to postpone briefing on the
2
claims construction by one week given the unexpected death of the father of defense lead counsel
3
Glen Diehl. Because of an internal miscommunication, Breville’s lead counsel now finds itself
4
with a difficult scheduling conflict. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline
5
for Breville to file its Claims Construction Reply brief by one week, i.e., May 2, 2013.
6
This is the third request to modify the briefing schedule. Breville filed its Opening Claims
7
Construction Statement on March 21, 2013, as previously ordered. Pursuant to the above-
8
referenced stipulation, Storebound filed its Claims Construction Response Brief on April 18,
9
2012. Breville’s Reply Brief is currently due on April 25, 2013. The Claims Construction
10
Hearing is currently set for June 18, 2013 with a tutorial set for June 4, 2013.
The parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend Breville’s deadline to file its
11
12
Reply Brief to May 2, 2103. This will not affect any other dates currently scheduled.
13
SO STIPULATED:
Dated: April 19, 2013
14
By:
/s/ Joseph A. Meckes
Joseph A. Meckes
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BREVILLE PTY LIMITED AND
BREVILLE USA, INC.
15
16
17
18
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
Dated: April 19, 2013
GRAHAM CURTIN P.A.
By:
/s/ Glen Diehl
Glen Diehl
Attorneys for Defendant
STOREBOUND LLC
19
20
21
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
Having considered the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
24
grants the parties’ Stipulation. Breville’s deadline to file its Reply Brief is extended to May 2,
25
2103.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
DATED:
April 22, 2013
Judge Jon S. Tigar
STIPULATION MODIFYING CLAIMS
CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?