Breville Pty Limited et al v. Storebound LLC

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines filed by Breville USA, Inc., Breville Pty Limited. Advice of Counsel due 10/7/2013. Fact Discovery due by 10/18/2013. Designation of Expert Witness due by 11/18/2013. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 12/16/2013. Expert Discovery due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP Nathan Lane, III (State Bar # 50961) Email: nathan.lane@squiresanders.com Joseph Meckes (Stat Bar # 190279) Email: joseph.meckes@squiresanders.com Jeremy Dutra (admitted pro hac vice) Email: jeremy.dutra@squiresanders.com 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: +1 415 954 0200 Facsimile: +1 415 393 9887 Attorneys for Plaintiff Breville Pty Limited and Breville USA, Inc. LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY P. WIDMAN Jeffrey P. Widman (State Bar #58628) Email: jpwidman@comcast.net Timothy D. Widman (State Bar # 189182) Email: tdwidmanesq@comcast.net 101 Race Street, Suite 100 San Jose, CA 95126-3041 Telephone: +1 408 288 6777 Facsimile: +1 408 288 7668 GRAHAM CURTIN, P.A. Glen Diehl (admitted pro hac vice) gdiehl@grahamcurtin.com 4 Headquarters Plaza P.O. Box 1991 Morristown, NJ 07962-1991 Telephone: +1 973 401 7138 Attorneys for Defendant Storebound LLC 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 BREVILLE PTY LIMITED, an Australia proprietary company, and BREVILLE USA, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 vs. STOREBOUND LLC, a New York limited liability company, Case No. CV-12-01783 JST The Honorable Jon S. Tigar Courtroom 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 Defendant. Complaint Filed: April 10, 2012 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 25 26 27 28 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-12-01783 JST 1 2 WHEREAS, the Parties to this Action are currently engaged in settlement discussions and are working on reducing the terms of a proposed settlement to writing; 3 WHEREAS, according to the Court’s minute order (Dkt. 27) adopting the parties’ 4 proposed case management schedule (Dkt 20), certain dates run from the date of entry of the 5 Court’s Claims Construction ruling, which the Court entered on June 19, 2013; 6 7 WHEREAS, based on the Court’s Scheduling Order upcoming deadlines are set forth in the chart below; 8 WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and agree to continue the below case management 9 deadlines (and any associated deadlines) by approximately two months to the proposed dates set 10 forth below in order to provide the Parties the time to continue negotiating and to document their 11 settlement agreement; 12 13 WHEREAS, the extensions requested below will not impact any other deadline already set by the Court. 14 15 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate that the Court postpone the deadlines of the events as set forth in the below chart: 16 Event Due Date (after claims construction) Current Deadline Proposed Deadline 50 days 60 days 90 days Aug. 8, 2013 Aug. 18, 2013 Sep. 17, 2013 Oct. 7, 2013 Oct. 18, 2013 Nov. 18, 2013 23 P.R. 3-7 Advice of Counsel Close of fact discovery Designation of Experts and exchange of expert reports for party with burden of proof Exchange rebuttal expert reports Close of expert discovery 120 days 150 days Oct. 17, 2013 Nov. 17, 2013 Dec. 16, 2013 Jan. 31, 2014 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 -1- STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-12-01783 JST 1 SO STIPULATED: 2 Dated: July 12, 2013 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 3 By: /s/ Joseph A. Meckes Joseph A. Meckes Attorneys for Plaintiff BREVILLE PTY LIMITED AND BREVILLE USA, INC. 4 5 6 7 Dated: July 12, 2013 GRAHAM CURTIN P.A. 8 By: /s/ Glen Diehl Glen Diehl Attorneys for Defendant STOREBOUND LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having considered the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the parties’ Stipulation. 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 DATED: July 15 , 2013 Judge Jonathan S. Tigar Hon. Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 -2- STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-12-01783 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?