Breville Pty Limited et al v. Storebound LLC

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines filed by Breville USA, Inc., Breville Pty Limited. Advice of Counsel due 10/7/2013. Fact Discovery due by 10/18/2013. Designation of Expert Witness due by 11/18/2013. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 12/16/2013. Expert Discovery due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
Nathan Lane, III (State Bar # 50961)
Email: [e-mail]
Joseph Meckes (Stat Bar # 190279)
Email: [e-mail]
Jeremy Dutra (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Breville Pty Limited and Breville USA, Inc.
LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY P. WIDMAN
Jeffrey P. Widman (State Bar #58628)
Email: [e-mail]
Timothy D. Widman (State Bar # 189182)
Email: [e-mail]
101 Race Street, Suite 100
San Jose, CA 95126-3041
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

GRAHAM CURTIN, P.A.
Glen Diehl (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
4 Headquarters Plaza
P.O. Box 1991
Morristown, NJ 07962-1991
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Storebound LLC

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

BREVILLE PTY LIMITED, an Australia
proprietary company, and BREVILLE
USA, INC., a California Corporation,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21

vs.
STOREBOUND LLC, a New York limited
liability company,

Case No. CV-12-01783 JST
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom 9
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

22
Defendant.

Complaint Filed: April 10, 2012

23
24

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

25
26
27
28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111

STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING
ORDER DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST

1
2

WHEREAS, the Parties to this Action are currently engaged in settlement discussions and
are working on reducing the terms of a proposed settlement to writing;

3

WHEREAS, according to the Court’s minute order (Dkt. 27) adopting the parties’

4

proposed case management schedule (Dkt 20), certain dates run from the date of entry of the

5

Court’s Claims Construction ruling, which the Court entered on June 19, 2013;

6
7

WHEREAS, based on the Court’s Scheduling Order upcoming deadlines are set forth in
the chart below;

8

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and agree to continue the below case management

9

deadlines (and any associated deadlines) by approximately two months to the proposed dates set

10

forth below in order to provide the Parties the time to continue negotiating and to document their

11

settlement agreement;

12
13

WHEREAS, the extensions requested below will not impact any other deadline already set
by the Court.

14
15

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate that the Court postpone the deadlines of the
events as set forth in the below chart:

16
Event

Due Date
(after claims
construction)

Current
Deadline

Proposed
Deadline

50 days
60 days
90 days

Aug. 8, 2013
Aug. 18, 2013
Sep. 17, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013
Oct. 18, 2013
Nov. 18, 2013

23

P.R. 3-7 Advice of Counsel
Close of fact discovery
Designation of Experts and
exchange of expert reports for
party with burden of proof
Exchange rebuttal expert reports
Close of expert discovery

120 days
150 days

Oct. 17, 2013
Nov. 17, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013
Jan. 31, 2014

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

17
18
19
20
21
22

28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111

-1-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER
DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST

1

SO STIPULATED:

2

Dated: July 12, 2013

SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP

3

By:

/s/ Joseph A. Meckes
Joseph A. Meckes
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BREVILLE PTY LIMITED AND
BREVILLE USA, INC.

4
5
6
7

Dated: July 12, 2013

GRAHAM CURTIN P.A.

8

By:

/s/ Glen Diehl
Glen Diehl
Attorneys for Defendant
STOREBOUND LLC

9
10
11
12
13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
grants the parties’ Stipulation.

15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

DATED:

July 15

, 2013
Judge Jonathan S. Tigar
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111

-2-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER
DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV-12-01783 JST