Hood v. U.S. Government
Filing
5
ORDER of Sua Sponte Referral. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/13/2012. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-01788 CRB
ROBIN HOOD,
ORDER OF SUA SPONTE
REFERRAL
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. GOVERNMENT,
Defendant.
/
16
17
When cases that appear to be related have been assigned to different courts, the judge
18
with the latest-filed case may refer his matter to the other judge for a determination of
19
whether the cases are in fact related. See Local Civil Rule 3-12(c).
20
On behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff Robin Hood has charged
21
the United States and others for violations of the Racketeer-Influenced & Corrupt
22
Organizations Act. The Complaint is difficult to interpret.
23
After careful examination of the docket, this Court has determined that Hood’s action
24
might be related to Robin Hood, et al. v. U.S. Government, Banking Industry. et al., No. 12-
25
1542 (“Robin Hood I”).
26
Hood filed Robin Hood I on March 27, 2012, and was assigned to Judge Susan Illston.
27
Hood then filed this case on April 10, 2012. He additionally notified this Court of his desire
28
to proceed before Judge Illston. See Declination to Proceed (dkt. 3).
1
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 3-12(c), the Court refers this case straightway to the
2
Honorable Judge Susan Illston for a determination of whether this action relates to Robin
3
Hood, et al. v. U.S. Government, Banking Industry, et al., No. 12-1542.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 13, 2012
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2012\1788\Order of Referral 2.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?