Tucker v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 10

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 8 Stipulation (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DAVID B. NEWDORF, State Bar #172960
[e-mail]
VICKI F. VAN FLEET, State Bar #164598
[e-mail]
NEWDORF LEGAL
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1850
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 CITY OF RICHMOND
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

N E W D O R F L E GA L

220 Montgomery St. #1850
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

11
12
AARON TUCKER,

Case No. 12-cv-01829 MEJ

13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16

CITY OF RICHMOND, LT. CHARLES
WHITNEY, DT. STINA JOHANSON,
and DOES 1 to 50,

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED
ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANT’S PENDING
MOTION TO DISMISS AND SET
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Judge:

Hon. Maria-Elena James

17
Defendants.

Current Hearing Date:

18
May 31, 2012
19
New Requested Hearing Date:
20
June 14, 2012
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

1
STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING DATE- Case No. 12-cv-01829 MEJ

/s/

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS

4 HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff City of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss
5 [Fed R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6)] is continued to June 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
6
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opposition brief shall be filed on or before May
22, 2012 and the reply brief shall be filed on or before May 29, 2012.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

N E W D O R F L E GA L

220 Montgomery St. #1850
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

11
May 4, 2012
12 Dated:__________________________
13
14
15
16
17
18

_________________________________
Honorable Maria-Elena James
Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

3
STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING DATE- Case No. 12-cv-01829 MEJ