Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Law School Admission Council Inc

Filing 125

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 118 Plaintiff's Motion to File Second Amended Complaint; Plaintiff DFEH is required to E-FILE the amended document. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, et. al., No. C-12-1830 EMC 9 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC., 13 (Docket No. 118) Defendant. ___________________________________/ 14 15 16 Plaintiff Department of Fair Employment and Housing has filed a Motion for Leave to File a 17 Second Amended Complaint. Motion (Docket No. 118). Defendant Law School Admission 18 Council, Inc., does not oppose Plaintiff’s motion, and the parties have filed a joint stipulation 19 documenting Defendant’s consent to filing the amended complaint. Stipulation (Docket No. 124). 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) permits a party to amend a pleading before trial without leave of court when 21 it has obtained the written consent of the opposing party. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The parties’ joint stipulation meets the requirements of this rule. Therefore, Plaintiff’s 2 Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed. Plaintiff is ordered to electronically file a copy of the 3 amended pleading. The hearing on Plaintiff’s motion set for April 18, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. is hereby 4 VACATED. 5 This order disposes of Docket No. 118. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: March 27, 2013 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?