Scott v. Astrue
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/14/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 12-01835 JSW
MICHAEL C. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
DEFENDANT TO INFORM
COURT WHETHER THEY
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES
In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). On December 12, 2012, the Court received Plaintiff’s
consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. Accordingly, Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to
advise the Court, no later than December 28, 2012, as to whether they consent to have a
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action.1 For the parties’
convenience, consent forms are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms”
section. The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a specific
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 14, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint
case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference.
Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?