Golden Gate Technology, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics, Corp.

Filing 42

ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 7/12/2013 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 5/22/2013 03:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 5/15/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Fr ancisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/16/12. 41 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 35 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, 38 Order on Stipulation Revised Case Schedule filed by Golden Gate Technology, Inc.. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANDREW D. FORTNEY (SBN 178699) SHERRIE M. FLYNN (SBN 240215) BRADLEY J. LEVANG (SBN 226922) The Law Offices of Andrew D. Fortney, Ph.D., P.C. 1725 N. Fine Ave., Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93727 Telephone: (559) 432-6847 Facsimile: (559) 432-6872 Email: andrew.fortney@fortneylaw.com Email: sherrie.flynn@fortneylaw.com Email: bradley.levang@fortneylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GOLDEN GATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. MARK E. MILLER (SBN 130200) MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW (SBN 242640) TIMOTHY BYRON (SBN 277569) ELIZABETH OFFEN-BROWN (SBN 279077) O’Melveny & Myers LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Email: markmiller@omm.com Email: msapoznikow@omm.com Email: tbyron@omm.com Email: eoffenbrown@omm.com Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 GOLDEN GATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California Corporation 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 MENTOR GRAPHICS CORP., an Oregon Corporation, 20 21 Defendant 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:12-cv-01840-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE SCHEDULE JUDGE: HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 23 24 25 Plaintiff Golden Gate Technology, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corporation (“Defendant”) hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 26 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2012, the Court granted the Joint Motion for Extension of 27 Time which stipulated that Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions will be due on December 15, 28 2012, and that the parties will submit a joint schedule pursuant to the Patent Local Rules to set all subsequent dates after GGT submits an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 35); Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Revised Case Schedule Case No. 3:12-cv-01840-SI 1 WHEREAS, on October 12, 2012, the Court granted the Stipulation and [Proposed] 2 Order Regarding Filing of First Amended Complaint and Service of Amended Infringement 3 Contentions (ECF No. 38); 4 5 WHEREAS, as part of the October 12, 2012 Stipulation, the parties agreed to jointly submit a revised schedule by November 15, 2012 (ECF No. 38); 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (“FAC”) on October 17, 2012 (ECF No. 39); and 8 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Answer to the FAC on November 5, 2012 (ECF No. 40). 9 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that subject to the Court’s approval and any 10 modifications to be made by the Court subject to the Court’s availability, the case schedule shall 11 be modified as follows: 12 Event Current Date 13 Defendant serves Invalidity Contentions December 15, 2012 14 15 [Proposed] New Date N/A (ECF No. 35) October 16, 2012 January 14, 2012 November 7, 2012 February 4, 2013 December 4, 2012 March 4, 2013 January 15, 2013 April 3, 2013 January 29, 2013 April 17, 2013 February 12, 2013 May 1, 2013 25 Parties exchange a list of claim terms, phrases or clauses which that party contends should be construed by the Court The parties will exchange proposed constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to Pat. L.R. 4-2. The Parties will meet and confer and file a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Completion of any discovery concerning claim construction, including depositions/discovery of experts. Plaintiff files Opening Claim Construction Brief Defendant files Opposing Claim Construction Brief Plaintiff files Reply Claim Construction Brief February 19, 2013 May 8, 2013 26 Technology Tutorial March 6, 2013 Claim Construction Hearing March 13, 2013 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Revised Case Schedule 2013 May 15, 2012 or at the Court’s convenience May 22, 2012 or at the Court’s convenience Case No. 3:12-cv-01840-SI 2 7/12/13 @ 3:00 p.m. 1 Further Case Management Conference 2 Deadline to Amend the Pleadings Without Obtaining Leave from the Court Production of Advice of Counsel Evidence 3 At the Court’s convenience 20 days after claim construction order 50 days after claim construction order 4 At the Court’s convenience 20 days after claim construction order 50 days after claim construction order 5 6 Date: __November 15, 2012________ 7 8 Respectfully Submitted, O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: __/Mark E. Miller/_________________ MARK E. MILLER MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW TIMOTHY BYRON ELIZABETH OFFEN-BROWN Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION 9 10 11 12 13 14 Date: __November 15, 2012________ 15 Respectfully Submitted, THE LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW D. FORTNEY, Ph.D., P.C. 16 By: __/Andrew D. Fortney/_____________ ANDREW D. FORTNEY SHERRIE M. FLYNN BRADLEY J. LEVANG Attorneys for Plaintiff GOLDEN GATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 11/16/12 Date: ___________________________ _______________________________ Honorable Susan Illston 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Revised Case Schedule Case No. 3:12-cv-01840-SI 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?