Caldwell v. City of San Francisco et al
Filing
11
ORDER REGARDING 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by City of San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 10/2/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/9/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 8/6/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Attorney
SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3863
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Email:
sean.connolly@sfgov.org
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
MAURICE CALDWELL,
14
Plaintiff,
15
Case No. 12-cv-1892 EDL
vs.
16
17
18
19
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
DEPARTMENT; KITT CRENSHAW;
ARTHUR GERRANS; JAMES CROWLEY;
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REGARDING
DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
AND CONTINUANCE OF THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Trial Date:
Not Set
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court having considered the submissions, and good cause having been shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Administrative Motion For Order Granting
Defendant's an extension of time in which to respond to plaintiff's complaint is granted.
September 4, 2012
Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's complaint on or before October 12, 2012. The
October 9, 2012
Case management conference shall be continued until [December 11, 2012].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 6, 2012
THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Order Granting Defts Admin Mtn for Extension
Caldwell v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-1892
1
n:\lit\li2012\120314\00789230.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?