Sullivan et al v. City of San Rafael et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 42 Stipulation to continue date for disclosure of experts and disclosure of rebuttal experts. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thomas F. Bertrand, SBN 056560 Richard W. Osman, SBN 167993 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, Ca 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Email: rosman@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, RYAN DEMARTA and RYAN COGBILL Brian K. Gearinger, SBN 146125 GEARINGER LAW GROUP 825 Van Ness Ave., 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 440-3175 Facsimile: (415) 440-3103 Email: brian@gearingerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 James D. Rush, SBN 240284 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES D. RUSH, APC 7665 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 200 Novato, CA 94945 Telephone: (415) 897-4801 Facsimile: (415) 897-5316 Attorney for Plaintiffs GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA, Plaintiffs, v. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a government entity; SAN RAFAEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, a government entity; RYAN DEMARTA, individually, and in his capacity as police officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL; RYAN COGBILL, individually, and in his capacity as police officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL; and DOES 1 to 100, Case No.: CV 12-01922 MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS AND DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ 1 The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the 2 presently-scheduled March 29, 2013 Expert Disclosure date be continued to April 23, 2013, and the 3 April 8, 2013 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure date be continued to May 3, 2013 based on the following: 4 The last day to complete fact discovery in this matter is April 23, 2013. 5 Multiple depositions are scheduled during the next several weeks and the parties intend to have 6 their experts review and potentially include information from these depositions in their FRCP Rule 26 7 reports. Moving the expert disclosure dates will accommodate this. 8 9 Continuing the Expert Disclosure date and the Rebuttal Expert date will not affect any other dates in this case. 10 11 SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 22, 2013 BERTRAND, FOX AND ELLIOT 12 By: /s/ Richard W. Osman Richard W. Osman Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 15 Dated: March 22, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF JAMES D. RUSH By: /s/ James D. Rush James D. Rush Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 Dated: March 22, 2013 GEARINGER LAW GROUP By: /s/ Brian K. Gearinger Brian K. Gearinger Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Having reviewed the stipulation of counsel herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Expert 3 Disclosure date is continued from March 29, 2013 to April 23, 2013 and the Rebuttal Expert date is 4 continued from April 8, 2013 to May 3, 2013. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 March 25, 2013 DATED: ____________________ ___________________________________ HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?