Sullivan et al v. City of San Rafael et al

Filing 51

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 50 Stipulation to Continue Dates for Expert Disclosures and Disclosures of Rebuttal Experts. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Thomas F. Bertrand, SBN 056560
Richard W. Osman, SBN 167993
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, Ca 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
RYAN DEMARTA and RYAN COGBILL

Brian Gearinger, SBN 146125
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
825 Van Ness Ave., 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

James D. Rush, SBN 240284
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES D. RUSH, APC
7665 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 200
Novato, CA 94945
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20

GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA,
Plaintiffs,
v.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a government
entity; SAN RAFAEL POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a government entity;
RYAN DEMARTA, individually, and in
his capacity as police officer for the CITY
OF SAN RAFAEL; RYAN COGBILL,
individually, and in his capacity as police
officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL;
and DOES 1 to 100,

Case No.: CV 12-01922 MEJ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE DATES FOR EXPERT
DISCLOSURES AND DISCLOSURES OF
REBUTTAL EXPERTS

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND
DISCLOSURES OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ

1

STIPULATION

2
3

1.

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the

4

presently-scheduled May 7, 2013 Expert Disclosure date be continued to May 17, 2013, and the

5

May 17, 2013 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure date be continued to May 31, 2013.

6
7
8

2.

Brian Gearinger, co-counsel for Plaintiffs, is responsible for retaining Plaintiffs’ police

practices expert and providing all relevant materials to the expert necessary for the expert’s preparation
of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) written report. Mr. Gearinger will be attending a

9
funeral out-of-state such that he will not be able to oversee the timely completion of the report of
10
11

Plaintiff’s police practices. Mr. Gearinger explained his situation to Richard Osman, counsel for

12

Defendants. Mr. Osman graciously agreed to stipulate to Mr. Gearinger’s request to extend the deadlines

13

relating to Expert Disclosures and Rebuttal Expert Disclosures.

14

3.

15

dates in this case.

16
17

Moving the Expert Disclosure date and the Rebuttal Expert date will not affect any other

SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 6, 2013

BERTRAND, FOX AND ELLIOT

18
By: /s/ Richard W. Osman
Richard W. Osman
Attorneys for Defendants

19
20
21

Dated: May 6, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES D. RUSH
By: /s/ James D. Rush
James D. Rush
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: May 6, 2013

GEARINGER LAW GROUP
By: /s/ Brian Gearinger
Brian Gearinger
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND
DISCLOSURES OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ

1
2
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the stipulation of counsel herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Expert

4

Disclosure date is continued from May 7, 2013 to May 17, 2013 and the Rebuttal Expert date is

5

continued from May 17, 2013 to May 31, 2013.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

May 9, 2013
DATED: ____________________

___________________________________
HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND
DISCLOSURES OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ