Sullivan et al v. City of San Rafael et al
Filing
79
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 78 Stipulation to continue pretrial dates. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Thomas F. Bertrand, SBN 056560
Richard W. Osman, SBN 167993
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, Ca 94109
Telephone: (415) 353-0999
Facsimile: (415) 353-0990
Email: rosman@bfesf.com
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
RYAN DEMARTA and RYAN COGBILL
Brian K. Gearinger, SBN 146125
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
825 Van Ness Ave., 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 440-3175
Facsimile: (415) 440-3103
Email: brian@gearingerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
James D. Rush, SBN 240284
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES D. RUSH, APC
7665 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 200
Novato, CA 94945
Telephone: (415) 897-4801
Facsimile: (415) 897-5316
Attorney for Plaintiffs
GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and
KOJI FUJITA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: CV 12-01922 MEJ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a government
entity; SAN RAFAEL POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a government entity;
RYAN DEMARTA, individually, and in
his capacity as police officer for the CITY
OF SAN RAFAEL; RYAN COGBILL,
individually, and in his capacity as police
officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL;
and DOES 1 to 100,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ
1
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the
2
following presently-scheduled pretrial dates be continued, as indicated, to accommodate the parties’
3
ongoing settlement efforts.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1.
Last day to meet and confer re pretrial matters – presently set for August 28, 2013.
Requested continuance to September 16, 2013.
2. Last day to file joint pretrial statement and motions in limine - presently set for September
12, 2013. Requested continuance to September 26, 2013.
3. Last day to file oppositions re in limine motions – presently set for September 19, 2013.
Requested continuance to October 3, 2013.
4. Last day to file joint jury instructions, verdict form, trial briefs and proposed voir dire –
presently set for September 27, 2013. Requested continuance to October 7, 2013.
5. Pretrial conference – presently set for September 26, 2013.
Requested continuance to
October 10, 2013.
The above requests are based on the parties’ ongoing settlement efforts. On July 2, 2013, this
15
Court issued a Status Order suggesting the parties would benefit from further settlement discussions. In
16
the same order, this Court requested the parties submit a joint status report and stated: “The parties shall
17
also indicate whether they would like a continuance of any pending pretrial or trial deadlines while they
18
continue with mediation.”
19
The parties agreed to submit the matter, which previously had been mediated, to Judge Beeler for
20
a settlement conference. The settlement conference was held on August 12, 2013 and did not result in
21
settlement. However, Judge Beeler suggested the parties continue their efforts and a further settlement
22
conference has been scheduled for September10, 2013. Because the joint pretrial statement and motions
23
in limine are due on September 12, 2013 and jury instructions, proposed voir dire and trial briefs are due
24
on September 27, 2013, if the pretrial filing deadlines and other related dates are not continued, the
25
parties will all be in the unfortunate position of committing significant resources to trial preparation in a
26
matter they are attempting to resolve.
27
Continuing these dates should not affect the currently-scheduled final pretrial conference and
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ
1
trial date.
2
3
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 23, 2013
BERTRAND, FOX AND ELLIOT
4
By: /s/ Richard W. Osman
Richard W. Osman
Attorneys for Defendants
5
6
7
Dated: August 23, 2013
LAW OFFICE OF JAMES D. RUSH
By: /s/ James D. Rush
James D. Rush
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
10
11
Dated: August 23, 2013
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
By: /s/ Brian K. Gearinger
Brian K. Gearinger
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
13
14
15
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Having reviewed the stipulation of counsel herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
the last day to meet and confer re pretrial matters, presently set for August 28, 2013 be
continued to September 16, 2013.
2.
The last day to file joint pretrial statement and motions in limine, presently set for
September 12, 2013, be continued to September 26, 2013.
3.
The last day to file oppositions re in limine motions, presently set for September 19,
2013, be continued to October 3, 2013.
4.
The last day to file joint jury instructions, verdict form, trial briefs and proposed voir dire,
presently set for September 27, 2013, be continued to October 7, 2013.
5.
The Pretrial Conference, presently set for September 26, 2013, be continued to October
10, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
13
6.
The final Pretrial Conference remains scheduled for October 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
14
7.
Trial remains scheduled for October 28, 2013, commencing at 9:30 a.m.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
August 27, 2013
DATED: ____________________
___________________________________
HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al.
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?