Sullivan et al v. City of San Rafael et al

Filing 79

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 78 Stipulation to continue pretrial dates. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thomas F. Bertrand, SBN 056560 Richard W. Osman, SBN 167993 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, Ca 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Email: rosman@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, RYAN DEMARTA and RYAN COGBILL Brian K. Gearinger, SBN 146125 GEARINGER LAW GROUP 825 Van Ness Ave., 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 440-3175 Facsimile: (415) 440-3103 Email: brian@gearingerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 James D. Rush, SBN 240284 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES D. RUSH, APC 7665 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 200 Novato, CA 94945 Telephone: (415) 897-4801 Facsimile: (415) 897-5316 Attorney for Plaintiffs GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 GREGORY L. SULLIVAN and KOJI FUJITA, Plaintiffs, v. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: CV 12-01922 MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a government entity; SAN RAFAEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, a government entity; RYAN DEMARTA, individually, and in his capacity as police officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL; RYAN COGBILL, individually, and in his capacity as police officer for the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL; and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ 1 The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the 2 following presently-scheduled pretrial dates be continued, as indicated, to accommodate the parties’ 3 ongoing settlement efforts. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1. Last day to meet and confer re pretrial matters – presently set for August 28, 2013. Requested continuance to September 16, 2013. 2. Last day to file joint pretrial statement and motions in limine - presently set for September 12, 2013. Requested continuance to September 26, 2013. 3. Last day to file oppositions re in limine motions – presently set for September 19, 2013. Requested continuance to October 3, 2013. 4. Last day to file joint jury instructions, verdict form, trial briefs and proposed voir dire – presently set for September 27, 2013. Requested continuance to October 7, 2013. 5. Pretrial conference – presently set for September 26, 2013. Requested continuance to October 10, 2013. The above requests are based on the parties’ ongoing settlement efforts. On July 2, 2013, this 15 Court issued a Status Order suggesting the parties would benefit from further settlement discussions. In 16 the same order, this Court requested the parties submit a joint status report and stated: “The parties shall 17 also indicate whether they would like a continuance of any pending pretrial or trial deadlines while they 18 continue with mediation.” 19 The parties agreed to submit the matter, which previously had been mediated, to Judge Beeler for 20 a settlement conference. The settlement conference was held on August 12, 2013 and did not result in 21 settlement. However, Judge Beeler suggested the parties continue their efforts and a further settlement 22 conference has been scheduled for September10, 2013. Because the joint pretrial statement and motions 23 in limine are due on September 12, 2013 and jury instructions, proposed voir dire and trial briefs are due 24 on September 27, 2013, if the pretrial filing deadlines and other related dates are not continued, the 25 parties will all be in the unfortunate position of committing significant resources to trial preparation in a 26 matter they are attempting to resolve. 27 Continuing these dates should not affect the currently-scheduled final pretrial conference and 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ 1 trial date. 2 3 SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 23, 2013 BERTRAND, FOX AND ELLIOT 4 By: /s/ Richard W. Osman Richard W. Osman Attorneys for Defendants 5 6 7 Dated: August 23, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF JAMES D. RUSH By: /s/ James D. Rush James D. Rush Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 23, 2013 GEARINGER LAW GROUP By: /s/ Brian K. Gearinger Brian K. Gearinger Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 13 14 15 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Having reviewed the stipulation of counsel herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. the last day to meet and confer re pretrial matters, presently set for August 28, 2013 be continued to September 16, 2013. 2. The last day to file joint pretrial statement and motions in limine, presently set for September 12, 2013, be continued to September 26, 2013. 3. The last day to file oppositions re in limine motions, presently set for September 19, 2013, be continued to October 3, 2013. 4. The last day to file joint jury instructions, verdict form, trial briefs and proposed voir dire, presently set for September 27, 2013, be continued to October 7, 2013. 5. The Pretrial Conference, presently set for September 26, 2013, be continued to October 10, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 13 6. The final Pretrial Conference remains scheduled for October 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 14 7. Trial remains scheduled for October 28, 2013, commencing at 9:30 a.m. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 August 27, 2013 DATED: ____________________ ___________________________________ HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES Sullivan v. City of San Rafael, et al. U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. CV-12-01922 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?