Forrester et al v. Orkin, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Count II (Wrongful Death) from Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 1, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SCOTT H.Z. SUMNER, SBN 156304 KHORRAMI, LLP 360 22nd Street, Suite 640 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 867-2000 Facsimile: (510) 867-2010 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, EVA FORRESTER, CHRISTOPHER M. FORRESTER, BRYAN THOMAS FORRESTER, and STEFANIE FORRESTER ANNA M. MARTIN, SBN 154279 JOSEPH F. CHARLES, SBN 228456 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone: (415) 561-8440 Facsimile: (415) 561-8430 DANIEL J. GERBER (admitted Pro Hac Vice) RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL Lincoln Plaza, Suite 1400 300 South Orange Avenue Orlando, FL 32801 Telephone: 407.872.7300 Facsimile: 407.841.2133 Attorneys for Defendants ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (also improperly sued and served herein as ORKIN, INC. & ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.) 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 EVA FORRESTER, CHRISTOPHER M. FORRESTER, BRYAN THOMAS FORRESTER, and STEFANIE FORRESTER , CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01975 JST JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNT II (WRONGFUL DEATH) FROM PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. 24 25 ORKIN, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 26 Defendants. 27 28 -1- JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNT II (WRONGFUL DEATH) FROM PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiffs Eva Forrester, Christopher M. Forrester, Bryan Thomas Forrester and Stefanie 2 Forrester (hereinafter the “Forresters”), by and through their attorney SCOTT H.Z. SUMNER, and 3 Defendant ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (hereinafter “Orkin”), by and through its 4 attorneys, Anna M. Martin, Joseph F. Charles and Daniel J. Gerber (admitted Pro Hac Vice) jointly 5 stipulate the following claim in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice 6 and that, by force of this stipulation and Order, the Forresters’ First Amended Complaint be 7 amended as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 1. Plaintiffs’ Second Cause of Action for wrongful death is dismissed with prejudice; 2. The Parties further stipulate that they are each to bear its own attorney’s fees and and costs and that all rights of appeal are waived, as related to the above-mentioned claim. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, filed in Contra Costa County Superior 13 Court on February 29, 2012 and removed to this court by Orkin on April 20, 2012, shall be deemed 14 so amended by this Stipulation and Order. 15 Because this amendment limits existing claims but does not add any new claims, Orkin’s 16 currently operative Answer, filed in Contra Costa County Superior Court on April 23, 2012, shall 17 continue to be its currently operative Answer. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED 19 20 DATED: March 19, 2013 By: /S/ Scott H.Z. Sumner SCOTT H.Z. SUMNER KHORRAMI, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs EVA FORRESTER, CHRISTOPHER M. FORRESTER, BRYAN THOMAS FORRESTER, and STEPHANIE FORRESTER DATED: March 19, 2013 By: /S/ Anna M. Martin ANNA M. MARTIN JOSEPH F. CHARLES Attorneys for Defendants ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; (also improperly sued and served herein as ORKIN, INC. and ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNT II (WRONGFUL DEATH) FROM PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 NO 5 RT 6 nS J u d ge J o ER 8 . Ti ga r A H 7 D RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA April 1, 2013 Dated: _________________ FO S UNIT ED 3 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. LI 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNT II (WRONGFUL DEATH) FROM PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?