Nicol v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 13 TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/7/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2012)

2
3
4
5
6

ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891)
[e-mail]
KELLEY S. OLAH (SBN 245180)
[e-mail]
GABRIELLE ANDERSON-THOMPSON (SBN 247039)
[e-mail]
YUKEVICH CALFO & CAVANAUGH
355 S. Grand Avenue, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
[phone]
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:

7 Attorneys for Defendants
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON &
8 JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON &
JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson &
9 Johnson, Inc."), and DEPUY INTERNATIONAL
LIMITED (erroneously sued as "DePuy
10 International, Ltd.")
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19
20

CASE NO. CV12-2006-RS

I LINDA NICOL,
VS.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION
TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON
JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON
JOHNSON, INC., DEPUY
INTERNATIONAL, LTD., THOMAS P.
SCHMALZRIED, M.D., THOMAS P.
SCHMALZRIED, M.D., A PROFESSIONAL
CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,

21
Defendants.
22
23

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Stay Proceedings submitted by Plaintiff LINDA

24 1 NICOL and Defendants DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES,
25 INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson, Inc."), and DEPUY
26 INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (erroneously sued as "DePuy International, Ltd.") (hereafter
27 collectively "the Parties"); upon consideration of all documents, files, and pleadings in this action;
28 and upon good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Cvi 2-2006-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

1

1.

The Parties’ request for a stay of proceedings is GRANTED;

2

2.

All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed, pending a decision by the Judicial

3

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on whether this case should be transferred to In re

4

DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation,

5

MDL Docket No. 2244.
3.

6

All deadlines, including any deadlines relating to a potential remand motion and

7

any outstanding responsive pleading, are extended until 30 days after the entry of a

8

joint Case Management Order in the MDL addressing remand briefing.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
0

11

:3

4

>

5/7

,2012
Hon. Richard Seeborg

z

4

Dated:

12

L

4
o

13
, z

Z()
0

14

J 0 <
< zLi zw

15

o

W

LL

Ll

D1i0

I

16

(JO O
UJO

17

:3

18

>_

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

26
27
28
CV 1 2-2006-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS