Nicol v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Filing
16
MDL CONDITIONAL ORDER (CTO-90) TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. In Re: Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2244. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 08/31/12 Page Page 1 PageID 2334
Case MDL No. Document 198 767 Filed 08/31/12 1 of 3 of 3
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.,
PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2244
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −90)
On May 23, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See 787 F.Supp.2d 1358 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 558 additional action(s)
have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such
actions have been assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to
Judge Kinkeade.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the
Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of May 23, 2011, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Aug 31, 2012
By s/*PAIGE LESSOR
DEPUTY CLERK
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
September 04, 2012
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 08/31/12 Page Page 2 PageID 2335
Case MDL No. Document 198 767 Filed 08/31/12 2 of 3 of 3
IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.,
PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2244
SCHEDULE CTO−90 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
ALABAMA NORTHERN
ALN
5
12−02611
Brown v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
12−06738
12−06823
12−06829
12−06832
12−06897
12−06905
12−06973
Wilhelmine Coate v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Allison Kersey et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Michael Pintilie et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Craig Liebscher v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Opposed 8/24/12
Robert Karr v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
Antonio Ruggieri et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
Dorothy Allen v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
2
12−01852
Zibull v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
3
12−02006
Nicol v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
12−00447
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM
2
GEORGIA NORTHERN
GAN
GAN
4
4
12−00190
12−00191
Stewart v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Harris et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
INDIANA NORTHERN
INN
3
MINNESOTA
12−00430
Crosby v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 08/31/12 Page Page 3 PageID 2336
Case MDL No. Document 198 767 Filed 08/31/12 3 of 3 of 3
MN
MN
MN
MN
0
0
0
0
12−02015
12−02016
12−02017
12−02018
Alsip v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Boykin v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Franklin v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
Whitaker v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
NEW YORK SOUTHERN
NYS
1
12−06079
Mulford v. Deputy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
12−20581
Thompson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
11−03379
Williams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
OHIO NORTHERN
OHN
1
TEXAS SOUTHERN
TXS
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?