Vargas et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO CONINUE CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/21/2012 TO 07/12/2012 filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 6/19/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2012)
Ephraim 0. Obi [S N: 207498]
LAW 0HICES 0 EPHRAIM 0. OBI
I 32c5
Wi1s1jre L3oufrvarcl. Suitc 1004
Los \n3eIcs, CaJiiJrnia 9001 0
Teiephc (313) 22-96SO
Eacsimile 0 i3 22-A2(
2
Attorney for PJaiuffs.
JUAN AR GAS nc1 T-IILDA VARGAS
:i.
UNTiLT Si.TES DISTRICT COURT
N0RTI-iFL DISTRICT OP CAL! J’OXNlA
J\k
ti
12
V
f..
C sc Io.: 3: i2- O2008-WH;\
GA Li A U.
11
pjj
APCO
7
\1ZLLP I 3’1K. \. A., UT AT,,
15
STIPUJAl1ON 10 CONTINtT. GASP
iANAGPMJ2NT (ONFE:IT
SC[WDU LED ‘OR O&/2/2Jfl 3 TI)
7/12/2O1 2. ; ORDER DENYING REQUEST
.:‘cRnLmts,
16
CRfRODM: S
19
ii
eoH
21
IT IS IiEI/RlY STIPULATED BE WEE!: /$N1 lEES, JUAN \C.EAS AND HILDA VN’W AND
22
DEFENDANTS. 1.1ES FARGO BANK, N A. FT AL. BY AND THROUSH IHEiR EESEC’[iVE C)UNSEL OF
23
11:UF A. M.,
BEFORE. THAT TB! C/SE MANAGEMENT UGNEFRENCE SCHEDUlED FOR JUNE 21, /012 A,
24
BE CONTINUED TO !ULY 12, 2012, AT 11:OL A M, CR ON A DATE CONVENIENT W.TH THE COURT
25
THIS STIPULATiON UAY BE FILED WITH FAXED SIGNATURES AND N COUNTER-PARTS.
27
28
STIPULATION
GASP MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 5/21/2012 TO
7/06/2012
I
2
Dated:
June
V
1
LA OFFICES OF EPHRAIM 0. OBI
18, 2412.
4
5
6
Th
-
Dy.
ttoi’
C. OH. Lsq.
fr intif1.
arLa
7
Juan \ ;
;;ud i{ Idu
L-phraw
Varg
.\nHii;, Fk:\vtIfinR1 nus-n. (2anipbH!
L)iid: Jtue
fryft:n
LJ.P
12
4’
13
Fiy:
Lhr. F
.
0
C
15
\Vf!LiS F
16
\Ht;
PAJ”K, NA., KJ
18
19
H
iS
H
i
22
As renoticed by the clerk, the case management conference is advanced to
June 20, 2012, at 11:45 a.m.
up
ls
illiam A
NO
RT
28
R NIA
U. S.
27
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
IFIE
AS M COi’RT JUDGE
DISTRICT OD
Judge W
H
ER
FO
June 19, 2012.
UNIT
ED
i)ad:
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
24
LI
2.3
A
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
STIPULATION ‘IC CONTINUE CASE M ANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 6/21/2012 TO
7’072012
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
2
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action.
I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling,
3 Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena,
California 91101-2459.
4
On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled:
5
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED
6
FOR 6/21/12 TO 7/12/12
on the interested parties in said case as follows:
7
BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing
8
correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S.
Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the
9
ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is
presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day
10
after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
11
12
Served By Means Other than Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System:
13
Counsel for Plaintiffs:
14
Ephraim O. Obi
LAW OFFICES OF EPHRAIM O. OBI
A Professional Law Corporation
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1004
Los Angeles, California 90010
Tel: (213) 252-9680; Fax: (213) 252-9203
15
16
17
18
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar
19 of this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena,
California on June 18, 2012.
20
21
Christine Daniel
22
(Type or Print Name)
/s/ Christine Daniel
(Signature of Declarant)
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR0310/00413947-1
CASE NO.: 12-02008-JCS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?