Vargas et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO CONINUE CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/21/2012 TO 07/12/2012 filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 6/19/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2012)

Download PDF
Ephraim 0. Obi [S N: 207498] LAW 0HICES 0 EPHRAIM 0. OBI I 32c5 Wi1s1jre L3oufrvarcl. Suitc 1004 Los \n3eIcs, CaJiiJrnia 9001 0 Teiephc (313) 22-96SO Eacsimile 0 i3 22-A2( 2 Attorney for PJaiuffs. JUAN AR GAS nc1 T-IILDA VARGAS :i. UNTiLT Si.TES DISTRICT COURT N0RTI-iFL DISTRICT OP CAL! J’OXNlA J\k ti 12 V f.. C sc Io.: 3: i2- O2008-WH;\ GA Li A U. 11 pjj APCO 7 \1ZLLP I 3’1K. \. A., UT AT,, 15 STIPUJAl1ON 10 CONTINtT. GASP iANAGPMJ2NT (ONFE:IT SC[WDU LED ‘OR O&/2/2Jfl 3 TI) 7/12/2O1 2. ; ORDER DENYING REQUEST .:‘cRnLmts, 16 CRfRODM: S 19 ii eoH 21 IT IS IiEI/RlY STIPULATED BE WEE!: /$N1 lEES, JUAN \C.EAS AND HILDA VN’W AND 22 DEFENDANTS. 1.1ES FARGO BANK, N A. FT AL. BY AND THROUSH IHEiR EESEC’[iVE C)UNSEL OF 23 11:UF A. M., BEFORE. THAT TB! C/SE MANAGEMENT UGNEFRENCE SCHEDUlED FOR JUNE 21, /012 A, 24 BE CONTINUED TO !ULY 12, 2012, AT 11:OL A M, CR ON A DATE CONVENIENT W.TH THE COURT 25 THIS STIPULATiON UAY BE FILED WITH FAXED SIGNATURES AND N COUNTER-PARTS. 27 28 STIPULATION GASP MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 5/21/2012 TO 7/06/2012 I 2 Dated: June V 1 LA OFFICES OF EPHRAIM 0. OBI 18, 2412. 4 5 6 Th - Dy. ttoi’ C. OH. Lsq. fr intif1. arLa 7 Juan \ ; ;;ud i{ Idu L-phraw Varg .\nHii;, Fk:\vtIfinR1 nus-n. (2anipbH! L)iid: Jtue fryft:n LJ.P 12 4’ 13 Fiy: Lhr. F . 0 C 15 \Vf!LiS F 16 \Ht; PAJ”K, NA., KJ 18 19 H iS H i 22 As renoticed by the clerk, the case management conference is advanced to June 20, 2012, at 11:45 a.m. up ls illiam A NO RT 28 R NIA U. S. 27 ERED O ORD D IT IS S IFIE AS M COi’RT JUDGE DISTRICT OD Judge W H ER FO June 19, 2012. UNIT ED i)ad: ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 24 LI 2.3 A 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C STIPULATION ‘IC CONTINUE CASE M ANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 6/21/2012 TO 7’072012 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, 3 Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. 4 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 5 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED 6 FOR 6/21/12 TO 7/12/12 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 7  BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing 8 correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the 9 ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day 10 after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 11 12 Served By Means Other than Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 13 Counsel for Plaintiffs: 14 Ephraim O. Obi LAW OFFICES OF EPHRAIM O. OBI A Professional Law Corporation 3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1004 Los Angeles, California 90010 Tel: (213) 252-9680; Fax: (213) 252-9203 15 16 17 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar 19 of this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on June 18, 2012. 20 21 Christine Daniel 22 (Type or Print Name) /s/ Christine Daniel (Signature of Declarant) 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0310/00413947-1 CASE NO.: 12-02008-JCS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?