Scott v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying (34) Motion Requesting Production of Documents and Things; granting (40) Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery in case 3:12-cv-02033-CRB. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,
13
/
14
This document relates to:
15
No. MDL 05-01699 CRB
ORDER RE MOTIONS (1)
REQUESTING PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS AND (2)
REQUESTING 90 DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME TO COMPLETE
DISCOVERY
Harril Glen Scott, 12-2033
____________________________________/
16
17
18
The Court is in receipt of two filings from Plaintiff Harril Glen Scott: (1) a Motion
19
Requesting Production of Documents and Things (dkt. 34) and (2) a Motion Requesting a 90
20
Day Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (dkt. 40). Defendant Pfizer has filed a notice
21
of non-opposition to both filings (dkt. 41).
22
23
Good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for an
Extension of Time; Plaintiff has until October 25, 2012 to provide the required evidence.
24
However, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Production. That Motion
25
appears to seek Plaintiff’s medical records from various entities. Plaintiff likely already has
26
the right to his own medical records, and should be able to request them from those entities
27
directly. To the extent that court intervention is required, Plaintiff should seek subpoenas
28
//
1
2
from courts in the proper jurisdiction(s).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: August 2, 2012
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\order re scott.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?