Scott v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 44 Motion to Compel; denying 45 Motion to Appoint Expert. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

13

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY AND
MORION REQUESTING COURT
[TO] APPOINT EXPERT

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,
/

14

This document relates to:

15

Harril Glen Scott, 12-2033
____________________________________/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

The Court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiff Harril Glen Scott’s Motion to Compel
Discovery (dkt. 44) and Motion Requesting Court [to] Appoint Expert (dkt. 45). The Court
DENIES the first motion for the reasons stated in its Order of August 2, 2012 (dkt. 42). It
DENIES the second motion because Plaintiff is not entitled to a court-appointed expert.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: August 10, 2012

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\order re scott 8-9-12.wpd