Scott v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical

Filing 70

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying (69) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:12-cv-02033-CRB. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

13

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND
REHEARING

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,
/

14

This document relates to:

15

Harril Glen Scott, 12-2033
____________________________________/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

The Court is in receipt of a filing by pro se Plaintiff Harril Glen Scott entitled “Motion
for Reconsideration and Rehearing.” See Mot. (dkt. 69). To the extent that Plaintiff asks the
Court to review a February 13, 2013 holding in the Southern District of Texas, this Court has
no jurisdiction to do so. To the extent that Plaintiff asks the Court to “empower itself with
jurisdiction to subpoena the documents needed to support the loss sustained,” Plaintiff
provides no authority permitting the Court to do so. Id. at 2. Moreover, there has been no
order in this Court “dismissing Claimant as a tag along Claimant.” See id. Defendant’s
motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s case is set for March 29, 2013. See MTD (dkt. 66).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: March 6, 2013

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\order re scott -3-5-13.wpd