Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Shoretel, Inc.
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING 59 STIPULATION Private ADR. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/5/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
Case3:12-cv-02036-JSW Document59 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jonathan D. Baker (Cal. Bar No. 196062)
Brent D. Rafferty (Cal Bar No. 221300)
FARNEY DANIELS LLP
800 S. Austin Ave., Suite 200
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: (512) 582-2828
Facsimile: (512) 582-2829
E-Mails: JBaker@farneydaniels.com
BRafferty@farneydaniels.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
13
14
Case No. 3:12-cv-02036-JSW
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
15
16
17
SHORETEL, INC.,
Defendant.
18
19
20
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
21
22
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
23
24
25
Private ADR: Private mediation with a mediator from JAMS or other provider.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by February 28, 2013.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS.
-1-
CASE NO: 3:12-cv-02036-JSW
Case3:12-cv-02036-JSW Document59 Filed08/31/12 Page2 of 3
1
Dated: August 31, 2012
FARNEY DANIELS, LLP
2
/s/ Jonathan D. Baker
Jonathan D. Baker
3
Counsel for Plaintiff
Brandywine Communications
Technologies, LLC
4
5
6
Dated: August 31, 2012
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
7
/s/ Christopher O. Green
Christopher O. Green
8
9
Counsel for Defendant
Avaya Inc.
10
11
12
I, Jonathan D. Baker, attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from each of the other signatories.
13
14
Dated: August 31, 2012
/s/ Jonathan D. Baker
Jonathan D. Baker
15
Counsel for Plaintiff
Brandywine Communications
Technologies, LLC
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
-2-
CASE NO: 3:12-cv-02036-JSW
Case3:12-cv-02036-JSW Document59 Filed08/31/12 Page3 of 3
1
[PROPOSED ORDER]
2
☐
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
☐
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
8
9
September 5
Dated: _____________, 2012
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
-3-
CASE NO: 3:12-cv-02036-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?