Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Weber

Filing 18

ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2012. Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/23/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)

Download PDF
Ronald L. Richman, SBN 139189 Susan J. Olson, SBN 152467 Edward D. Winchester, SBN 271500 Bullivant Houser Bailey PC 601 California Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: 415.352.2700 Facsimile: 415.352.2701 E-Mail: ron.richman@bullivant.com E-Mail: susan.olson@bullivant.com E-Mail: edward.winchester@bullivant.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Case No.: CV 12-02038 EMC and C12-2039 EMC CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 11/30/12 October 26, 2012 Date: Time: 9:00 a.m. Ctroom: 5, 17 th Floor Hon. Edward M. Chen Plaintiffs, VS. MURRAY STEVEN WEBER, dba WEBER TRACTOR SERVICE, Defendant. Case No.: CV 12-02039 EMC BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs, — 1— CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON VS. MURRAY STEVEN WEBER, dba WEBER TRACTOR SERVICE, Defendant. Plaintiffs hereby provide this abbreviated case management conference statement. Plaintiffs and Defendant, in both consolidated cases, reached a settlement of this action. The parties have finalized the settlement documents. It was anticipated that by August 30, 212, Defendants would have complied with the fully executed settlement agreement and this case would be dismissed. However, Defendants requested two extra weeks to comply with the fully executed settlement documents. Plaintiffs granted the request since the settlement agreement was fully executed. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, defendants were to make monthly installment payments. Upon receipt of the first installment payment, Plaintiffs would dismiss this case without prejudice. Upon receipt of the final installment payment, Plaintiffs would dismiss this case with prejudice. Even after providing Defendants with a further extension of time, Defendants failed to make any installment payment and are in default of the settlement agreement. Plaintiffs advised defendants that they are in default of the settlement agreement. Defendants were given ten (10) days to cure the default, pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement. Defendants failed to cure the default. The settlement agreement also contains a stipulation for entry of judgment should defendants be in default and fail to cure the default. Plaintiffs will file a motion for entry of judgment within the next 30 days. This case will not proceed to litigation. /// /// /// /// —2— CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON Based on the above, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court continue the October 26, 2012 Case Management Conference for approximately thirty days. DATED: October 17, 2012 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC Ronald L. Richman Susan J. Olson Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORDER Pursuant to the Plaintiffs' request to continue the case management conference and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 26, 2012 case management conference be continued to November 30 , 2012 at 9:00 a.m.., Courtroom 5, 17 th floor. If the motion for entry of judgment is filed before the new date set for the case management conference, the case management conference will be vacated. S UNIT ED RT U O DATED: October 23 , 2012 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA D RDERE SO OM. CHEN I EDWARD HON.T IS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE hen A H LI RT ER FO NO rd M. C dwa Judge E N F D IS T IC T O R —3— CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON C PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco by the law firm of Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC ("the business"), 601 California Street, Suite 1800, San Francisco, CA 94108. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. On October 17, 2012, I served the document(s) entitled: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON upon the following party(ies): MURRAY STEVEN WEBER dba WEBER TRACTOR SERVICE 867 2nd Avenue, Suite e Redwood City, CA 94063 BY E MAIL VIA PDF FILE: By transmitting on this date via e-mail a true and correct - copy scanned into an electronic file Adobe "pdf' format. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. x BY MAIL (CCP § 1013(a)): I am readily familiar with the ordinary practice of the business with respect to the collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I placed a true and correct copy(ies) of the abovetitled document(s) in an envelope(s) addressed as above, with first class postage thereon fully prepaid. I sealed the aforesaid envelope(s) and placed it(them) for collection and mailing by the United States Postal Service in accordance with the ordinary practice of the business. Correspondence so placed is ordinarily deposited by the business with the United States Postal Service on the same day. II BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (CCP § 1013(e), CRC 2008(e)): I transmitted the document(s) by facsimile transmission by placing it(them) in a facsimile machine (telephone number 415-352-2701) and transmitting it(them) to the facsimile machine telephone number(s) listed above. A transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. Each transmission was reported as complete and without error. A true and correct copy of the transmission report is attached hereto. BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY (CCP § 1013(c)): I am readily familiar with the ordinary practice of the business with respect to the collection and processing of correspondence for mailing by Express Mail and other carriers providing for overnight delivery. I placed a true and correct copy(ies) of the above-titled document(s) in an envelope(s) addressed as above, with first class postage thereon fully prepaid. I sealed the aforesaid envelope(s) and placed it(them) for collection and mailing by Express Mail or other carrier for overnight delivery in accordance with the ordinary practice of the business. Correspondence so placed is ordinarily deposited by the business with Express Mail or other carrier on the same day. —1— CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON BY PERSONAL SERVICE UPON AN ATTORNEY (CCP § 1011(a)): I placed a true and correct copy(ies) of the above-titled document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as indicated above. I delivered each of said envelope(s) by hand to a receptionist or a person authorized to accept same at the address on the envelope, or, if no person was present, by leaving the envelope in a conspicuous place in the office between the hours of nine in the morning and five in the afternoon. BY PERSONAL SERVICE UPON A PARTY (CCP § 1011(b)): I placed a true and correct copy(ies) of the above-titled document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as indicated above. I delivered each of said envelope(s) by hand to a person of not less than 18 years of age at the address listed on the envelope, between the hours of eight in the morning and six in the evening. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 17, 2012, at San Francisco, California. Terry S. Bremer 13900328.1 —2— CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?