Solis v. Webb et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING MOTION #49 AND CMC TO 11/16/12 AT 1:30 P.M. re 57 re 49 MOTION to Strike 43 Answer to Complaint. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 7 Plaintiff, 8 11 12 DENNIS WEBB, MATHIEU FIDIAM, J. ROBERT GALLUCCI, CONSULTING FIDUCIARIES, INC., and THE PARROT CELLULAR EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE SECRETARY'S AND CFI'S STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON SECRETARY'S MOTION TO STRIKE CFI'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ERISA 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001, et seq. It is hereby ORDERED that the Secretary's and CFI's Stipulation To Continue September 14, 2012 Hearing On Secretary's Motion To Strike CFI'S Affirmative Defenses is GRANTED, and that the hearing on Secretary's Motion To Strike CFI'S Affirmative Defenses scheduled for September 14, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to November 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. The CMC is reset from November 16, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. An updated joint CMC Statement shall be filed by November 9, 2012. 26 27 DERED SO OR ED ______________________________ IT IS DIFI The Honorable Edward M. Chen AS MO United States District Court Judge n M. Che Edward Judge NO 28 September 6, Dated: __________________ 2012 RT U O 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 24 S 23 R NIA 10 v. Civil Action No. C 12-2055 EMC RT H ER FO 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LI 6 HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, A 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?