Solis v. Webb et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING MOTION #49 AND CMC TO 11/16/12 AT 1:30 P.M. re 57 re 49 MOTION to Strike 43 Answer to Complaint. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
7
Plaintiff,
8
11
12
DENNIS WEBB, MATHIEU FIDIAM,
J. ROBERT GALLUCCI, CONSULTING
FIDUCIARIES, INC., and THE PARROT
CELLULAR EMPLOYEE STOCK
OWNERSHIP PLAN,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING THE
SECRETARY'S AND CFI'S
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON SECRETARY'S
MOTION TO STRIKE CFI'S
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
ERISA 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001, et seq.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Secretary's and CFI's Stipulation To Continue
September 14, 2012 Hearing On Secretary's Motion To Strike CFI'S Affirmative Defenses
is GRANTED, and that the hearing on Secretary's Motion To Strike CFI'S Affirmative
Defenses scheduled for September 14, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to November 16,
2012 at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The CMC is reset from November 16, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
An updated joint CMC Statement shall be filed by November 9, 2012.
26
27
DERED
SO OR ED
______________________________
IT IS
DIFI
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
AS MO
United States District Court Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
NO
28
September 6,
Dated: __________________ 2012
RT
U
O
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
24
S
23
R NIA
10
v.
Civil Action No. C 12-2055 EMC
RT
H
ER
FO
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
LI
6
HILDA L. SOLIS,
Secretary of the United States
Department of Labor,
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?