Luce et al v. Gomez et al

Filing 19

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY 30 DAYS. Defendant Apple Inc. shall have until June 28, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 29, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

1

DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
[e-mail]

2

DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)

3

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

[e-mail]

4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

TOM LUCE, BRIAN KROLL,
MATT BLACKETT, LAWRENCE
RIGGS,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiffs,
v.
SELENA GOMEZ, SELENA
GOMEZ & THE SCENE, LINDY
ROBBINS, TOBY GAD,
HOLLYWOOD RECORDS, INC., a
California Corporation, HEY
KIDDO MUSIC, GAD SONGS,
LLC, a Limited Liability Company,
APPLE INC., a California
Corporation, EMI APRIL MUSIC,
INC., a Connecticut Corporation, and
KOBALT MUSIC SERVICES
AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
Corporation.

Case No. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY
30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)
Current response date: May 29, 2012
New response date: June 28, 2012

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Tom Luce, Brian Kroll, Matt Blackett, and

2

Lawrence Riggs (Plaintiffs) filed this action against, among others, Defendant

3

Apple Inc., (Apple), and a response is currently due May 29, 2012 ;

4

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the Plaintiffs and Apple have

5

agreed to extend the time within which Apple must answer or otherwise respond to

6

the Complaint for 30 days, until June 28, 2012;

7

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Apple have not previously sought an

8

extension of time in this action and this extension will not alter the date of any

9

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

10
11

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Apple, through their respective
counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

12
13

Defendant Apple Inc. in the above-entitled matter shall have until June
28, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

14
15

Dated: May 25, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

16

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

17
18

By:

/s/ David R. Eberhart
David R. Eberhart
Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.

19
20
21

Dated: May 25, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

22

H

ER

R NIA

/s/ Nicholas A. Carlin
Nicholas A. Carlin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Tom Luce, Brian Kroll, Matt Blackett,
Lawrence Riggs

FO

By:

LI

RT

28

ey
. Chesn

axine M
Judge M

NO

27

D

RDERE
S SO O
IT I

A

26

UNIT
ED

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

S

23

PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

-2-

CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT