Luce et al v. Gomez et al

Filing 37

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 26, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
[e-mail]
DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

TOM LUCE, BRIAN KROLL, MATT
BLACKETT, LAWRENCE RIGGS,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,
v.
SELENA GOMEZ, SELENA GOMEZ &
THE SCENE, LINDY ROBBINS, TOBY
GAD, HOLLYWOOD RECORDS, INC., a
California Corporation, HEY KIDDO
MUSIC, GAD SONGS, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company, APPLE INC., a
California Corporation, EMI APRIL
MUSIC, INC., a Connecticut Corporation,
and KOBALT MUSIC SERVICES
AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation.

Case No. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Original response date: May 29, 2012
Current response date: July 27, 2012
New response date: August 10, 2012

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Tom Luce, Brian Kroll, Matt Blackett, and Lawrence Riggs

2

(Plaintiffs) filed this action against, among others, Defendants Apple Inc., (Apple) and

3

Hollywood Records, Inc. (Hollywood Records), and a response was originally due May 29, 2012;

4

WHEREAS, on May 25, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the Plaintiffs and

5

Apple agreed to extend the time within which Apple must answer or otherwise respond to the

6

Complaint until June 28, 2012;

7

WHEREAS, on May 29, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the Plaintiffs and

8

Hollywood Records agreed to extend the time within which Hollywood Records must answer or

9

otherwise respond to the Complaint until July 2, 2012;

10

WHEREAS, on June 26, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the Plaintiffs and

11

Apple, and the Plaintiffs and Hollywood Records, agreed to extend the time within which Apple

12

and Hollywood Records must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until July 27, 2012;

13

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the Plaintiffs and Apple, and the

14

Plaintiffs and Hollywood Records, have respectively agreed to extend the time within which

15

Apple and Hollywood Records must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until August

16

10, 2012 so that the parties can continue their attempt to resolve this matter outside of the

17

courtroom. This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

18

Court order;

19
20
21
22

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Apple, and Hollywood Records, through their
respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
Defendant Apple Inc. and Defendant Hollywood Records, Inc. in the aboveentitled matter shall have until August 10, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

1

Dated: July 25, 2012

2

Respectfully submitted,
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

3
4

/s/ David R. Eberhart
David R. Eberhart
Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.
By:

5
6
7

Dated: July 25, 2012

8

Respectfully submitted,
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP

9
10

/s/ Nicholas A. Carlin
Nicholas A. Carlin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Tom Luce, Brian Kroll, Matt Blackett,
Lawrence Riggs
By:

11
12
13

Dated: July 25, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

14
15
/s/ Karen N. Frederiksen
Karen N. Frederiksen
Attorney for Defendant
Hollywood Records, Inc.
By:

16
17
18
19

ATTESTATION

20
21
22

Pursuant to General Order No. 45X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories.

23
24

DATED: July 25, 2012

By: /s/ David R. Eberhart
David R. Eberhart

25
26
27
28
-3-

CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

1
2

PROPOSED ORDEER
Upon stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6

DATED: July ,26, 2012
2012
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

CASE NO. CV12-2063 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT