Hoa v. Cate et al
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying 105 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
PAUL HOA,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-12-2078 EMC
MATHEW CATE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Docket No. 105)
13
14
15
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Paul Hoa’s motion for relief from a discovery
16
order issued by Judge Cousins. See Docket No. 99 (order). Having considered the motion, as well
17
as all other evidence of record, the Court hereby DENIES the motion. See Civ. L.R. 72-2
18
(providing that a motion may be denied without ordering a response).
19
Under federal law, “[a] non-dispositve order entered by a magistrate [judge] must be deferred
20
to unless it is ‘clearly erroneous or contrary to law.’” Grimes v. City & County of San Francisco,
21
951 F.2d 236, 241 (9th Cir. 1991). When a district court reviews a magistrate judge’s order, it “may
22
not simply substitute its judgment for that of the [magistrate judge].” Id.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Here, Mr. Hoa does not claim that Judge Cousins acted contrary to law; rather, he has argued
2
that Judge Cousins committed clear error. Mr. Hoa, however, has not met this standard. In addition
3
to the reasons articulated by Judge Cousins, the Court also finds a deposition of Mr. Alioto
4
unjustified given the lack of any evidence from which it could be inferred that Mr. Alioto acted with,
5
e.g., deliberate indifference as opposed to mere negligence. See Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1205-
6
06 (9th Cir. 2011).
7
This order disposes of Docket No. 105.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Dated: September 16, 2013
12
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?