Hoa v. Cate et al

Filing 135

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Granting Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint filed by Richard Riley, Raymond Matteucci, Thomas Aliotto, Tammy Foss, Ronald Chan, David Moore, George Moon. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/29/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PATRICK R. MCKINNEY Supervising Deputy Attorney General JAMES J. JIRN, SBN. 241189 MANEESH SHARMA, SBN. 280084 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5553 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Maneesh.Sharma@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NANCY TAN, Guardian Ad-Litem for PAUL HOA, v. RICHARD RILEY, et al., C 12-2078 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Courtroom: Judge: Defendants. Trial Date: Action Filed: 5 The Hon. Edward M. Chen None April 25, 2012 On May 23, 2014 the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci’s (collectively “State Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (TAC). The parties, Plaintiff Paul Hoa, State Defendants, and Defendants T. Gregory Stagnitto, Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc., and David F. Lopez, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for all Defendants to file an answer to Plaintiff’s TAC is extended to June 23, 2014. 28 1 Stip. And [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs.’ Answers (C 12-2078 EMC ) 1 SO STIPULATED: 2 3 DATED: May 28, 2014 4 _s/ Gene H. Shioda____________ GENE H. SHIODA JAMES A. KIM JASON Y. LIE Attorneys for Plaintiff Paul Hoa 5 6 7 8 LAW OFFICE OF GENE H. SHIODA DATED: May 28, 2014 GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN, AND MITCHELL 9 _s/ John F. Geary______________ JOHN F. GEARY ROBERT W. HENKELS Attorneys for Defendants David F. Lopez, T. Gregory Stagnitto, Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc. 10 11 12 13 DATED: May 28, 2014 15 16 _s/ Maneesh Sharma___________ MANEESH SHARMA JAMES J. JIRN Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 5/29/14 Dated: ___________________________ __________________________ D The Honorable O ORDM. Chen Edward ERE SS TI United IStates District Court Judge 24 RT 26 SF2012205056 40977585.doc dward Judge E NO 25 ER H 27 28 2 n M. Che A 23 RT U O 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 19 FO 18 LI 17 21 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PATRICK R. MCKINNEY Supervising Deputy Attorney General UNIT ED 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C Stip. And [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs.’ Answers (C 12-2078 EMC ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case Name: Tan, Nancy, Guardian Ad-Litem for Paul Hoa v. Riley, et al. No. C 12-2078 EMC I hereby certify that on May 28, 2014, I electronically filed the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 28, 2014, at San Francisco, California. L. Santos Declarant 40978772.doc /s/ L. Santos Signature

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?