Hoa v. Cate et al
Filing
135
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Granting Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint filed by Richard Riley, Raymond Matteucci, Thomas Aliotto, Tammy Foss, Ronald Chan, David Moore, George Moon. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/29/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PATRICK R. MCKINNEY
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
JAMES J. JIRN, SBN. 241189
MANEESH SHARMA, SBN. 280084
Deputy Attorneys General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5553
Fax: (415) 703-1234
E-mail: Maneesh.Sharma@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T.
Alioto and R. Matteucci
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
NANCY TAN, Guardian Ad-Litem for
PAUL HOA,
v.
RICHARD RILEY, et al.,
C 12-2078 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Courtroom:
Judge:
Defendants. Trial Date:
Action Filed:
5
The Hon. Edward M. Chen
None
April 25, 2012
On May 23, 2014 the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants D. Moore, R.
Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci’s (collectively “State Defendants”)
motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (TAC). The parties, Plaintiff Paul Hoa,
State Defendants, and Defendants T. Gregory Stagnitto, Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc., and
David F. Lopez, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for all Defendants
to file an answer to Plaintiff’s TAC is extended to June 23, 2014.
28
1
Stip. And [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs.’ Answers (C 12-2078 EMC )
1
SO STIPULATED:
2
3
DATED: May 28, 2014
4
_s/ Gene H. Shioda____________
GENE H. SHIODA
JAMES A. KIM
JASON Y. LIE
Attorneys for Plaintiff Paul Hoa
5
6
7
8
LAW OFFICE OF GENE H. SHIODA
DATED: May 28, 2014
GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN, AND
MITCHELL
9
_s/ John F. Geary______________
JOHN F. GEARY
ROBERT W. HENKELS
Attorneys for Defendants
David F. Lopez, T. Gregory Stagnitto,
Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc.
10
11
12
13
DATED: May 28, 2014
15
16
_s/ Maneesh Sharma___________
MANEESH SHARMA
JAMES J. JIRN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon,
T. Alioto and R. Matteucci
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
5/29/14
Dated: ___________________________
__________________________
D
The Honorable O ORDM. Chen
Edward ERE
SS
TI
United IStates District Court Judge
24
RT
26
SF2012205056
40977585.doc
dward
Judge E
NO
25
ER
H
27
28
2
n
M. Che
A
23
RT
U
O
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
19
FO
18
LI
17
21
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PATRICK R. MCKINNEY
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
UNIT
ED
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Stip. And [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs.’ Answers (C 12-2078 EMC )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case Name:
Tan, Nancy, Guardian Ad-Litem
for Paul Hoa v. Riley, et al.
No.
C 12-2078 EMC
I hereby certify that on May 28, 2014, I electronically filed the following documents with the
Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be
accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true
and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 28, 2014, at San Francisco, California.
L. Santos
Declarant
40978772.doc
/s/ L. Santos
Signature
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?